diff options
author | Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> | 2014-05-07 14:54:54 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> | 2014-05-07 15:07:19 +0200 |
commit | cc0a7699bb79efad488094e33464d4793758ee3f (patch) | |
tree | 31541e288a9214e2cc263cc51bd8860be04e92ea /dictionaries | |
parent | 9bd4bd431cefda3602701ea648e221be01af7a5d (diff) |
fdo#75519: fix chapter cross references
It would be possible to modify the condition in
SwChapterField::ChangeExpansion() to check for rTxtNd.GetNumRule() as
well and make the bugdoc work again, but do we really want to use
"chapter reference" to refer to plain numbering? Perhaps it would be
better to add a "numbering reference" field type; without investigating
what Word actually does here and what the actual problem is that was
supposedly fixed here (which is not possible given there's no reproducer
document) it's best for now to just revert it.
(regression from commit 6319803762d051c4aa645692cde7245a1bbcf7ee)
Change-Id: I7eb9ea46e42729c53c350ff450d49a1eb84ee8eb
Diffstat (limited to 'dictionaries')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions