calling IsSet() before Call() on Link<> is unnecessary

the Call() already does a check

Found with:
git grep -A 1 -w 'IsSet()'
| grep -B 1 '.Call('
| grep ':'
| cut -d ':' -f 1

Change-Id: Ia7248f5d62640b75f705e539c3d1183e39c0d847

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/editeng/source/outliner/outlvw.cxx b/editeng/source/outliner/outlvw.cxx
index 902d6a0f518a..c14fbaf7a264 100644
--- a/editeng/source/outliner/outlvw.cxx
+++ b/editeng/source/outliner/outlvw.cxx
@@ -678,8 +678,7 @@ void OutlinerView::Cut()
     if ( !ImpCalcSelectedPages( false ) || pOwner->ImpCanDeleteSelectedPages( this ) ) {
         pEditView->Cut();
         // Chaining handling
-        if (aEndCutPasteLink.IsSet())
-            aEndCutPasteLink.Call(NULL);
+        aEndCutPasteLink.Call(NULL);
     }
 }
 
@@ -712,8 +711,7 @@ void OutlinerView::PasteSpecial()
 
         // Chaining handling
         // NOTE: We need to do this last because it pEditView may be deleted if a switch of box occurs
-        if (aEndCutPasteLink.IsSet())
-            aEndCutPasteLink.Call(NULL);
+        aEndCutPasteLink.Call(NULL);
     }
 }