tdf#80194 proof search: assert to find proof of code correctness.

I'm sure that these functions need to change because they
just seem very wrong. I think these are fall-back, safety
sections because usually the nEsc is already converted
away from _AUTO_ prior to reaching this point.

But this is all just based on code-reading.
It would be nice to have proof of this - especially
since the values for subscript are unexpected. I would
have expected it to use a value comparable to DFLT_ESC_SUB,
and not some random/magical -20.

(Note: the _AUTO_SUPER historically refered to an absolute 33
and not DFLT_ESC_SUPER until I recently changed that...)

Change-Id: I3bef0841f9a20f09994b2372e9a7db5941b29c9f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88997
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <justin_luth@sil.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions