diff options
author | Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> | 2016-04-27 14:50:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk> | 2016-04-28 06:47:29 +0000 |
commit | b63c3d9bd9e616a7d38df6f12226cc3b5fd65c2d (patch) | |
tree | 2ee8e741aae6953539374b0eddab0b7dbbde7342 /g | |
parent | 79226e41fc4fa71b1f94bba0c6feaa318852d954 (diff) |
Originally in 2004 commit 0339e43208cd7b98d302e420b39ac32911acaa56 added a
"DBG_ASSERT( GetOutDevType() != OUTDEV_PRINTER, "DrawImage(): Images can't
be drawn on any mprinter" );"
Recently commit f749ffbdf4c007f1a42bcafc9c2723c47bac22d1 made the mistake
of trusting this assertion to be correct and added Printer::DrawImage()
overrides that do a hard "assert()" now and don't do any drawing.
Armin claims that the implementation of OutputDevice::DrawImage() should
actually work for Printer as well due to fall-backs and thus the
original DBG_ASSERT was misleading.
This matters when printing documents that contain form controls
such as ImageControl.
Additionally, Image::Draw() should not return early when
IsDeviceOutputNecessary() is false, because that is the case when
printing, where instead a meta-file is recorded.
The called OutputDevice::DrawBitmapEx() will check
IsDeviceOutputNecessary() internally anyway.
This check was actually always there, so i do not understand how this
should have worked in LO 4.2, as the bug reporters claim.
(cherry picked from commit ef52ce82bf55b37279e344ea5fef67b4277fb009)
Change-Id: I92ba19e7036197d1dde88c361f8e1cb59fae3a60
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/24439
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.co.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'g')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions