diff options
author | Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr> | 2015-03-08 21:32:39 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> | 2015-03-19 13:08:18 +0000 |
commit | 61a3ace9f42a37640b1ec18fad776ba7c1f61714 (patch) | |
tree | 2bf115f739c4c99ba5f9f42948712b4938c1e8ff /officecfg/registry | |
parent | 98c532b38589945717ff17ed344a358479074e5b (diff) |
Related tdf#50133: Wrong underlining in Reports
By running some tests, I noticed double wave didn't appear when opening report in non edit mode.
First you must know that to indicate "double wave", xml contains these 2 information:
style:text-underline-style="wave" style:text-underline-type="double"
The problem is the reading order of the parser doesn't seem the same each time.
So if it reads style then type, it's ok thanks to this part:
132 case awt::FontUnderline::DOUBLE:
133 // A double line style has priority over a bold line style,
134 // but not over the line style itself.
135 switch( eUnderline )
136 {
137 case awt::FontUnderline::SINGLE:
138 case awt::FontUnderline::BOLD:
139 break;
140 case awt::FontUnderline::WAVE:
141 case awt::FontUnderline::BOLDWAVE:
142 eNewUnderline = awt::FontUnderline::DOUBLEWAVE;
143 break;
but if the parser read type in the first place then style, the case FontUnderline "DOUBLEWAVE" wasn't managed
Change-Id: Ie090507898e537827eebaae157dfac248baa43f1
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/14801
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'officecfg/registry')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions