diff options
author | Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com> | 2017-12-11 18:21:32 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+LibreOffice@googlemail.com> | 2017-12-12 18:39:27 +0100 |
commit | 51bb22f7a8f1d9fe02243aa58427d63916226793 (patch) | |
tree | 60030db29227964a071e8ce72e7ec943bf2895fe /sc | |
parent | fd989b76221beeaa7528e86ca74e075274c9d3d6 (diff) |
Resolves: tdf#114406 treat % as the operator that it is
Regression from
commit 73c7e0921d752df53004ed55735f3e8888cc592f
Date: Tue Sep 20 21:39:10 2016 +0200
sc-perf: tdf#79023 for ODFF do not call SvNumberFormatter to determine numeric
for ODFF, and for OOXML
commit a8a8ff59c5749bbe1f2f58ea8fd42d66e6ae2a81
Date: Tue Sep 20 22:37:59 2016 +0200
sc-perf: tdf#79023 do not call SvNumberFormatter also for numbers in OOXML
Numbers followed by a percent operator like 100% were always
(wrongly) treated as one entity (by '%' having ScCharFlags::Value)
and incidentally handled by the number formatter's parser, which
so far "worked" in the sense that the correct constant number was
produced (i.e. 1 here), but the expression detail was lost.
The commits above for performance reasons when reading ODF or
OOXML files don't let a symbol pass through the number formatter's
parser anymore and the "100%" does not represent a strict number,
so lead to #NAME? error at the end.
Set the proper flags in the compiler's character table to treat
'%' as operator in all circumstances.
Change-Id: I266beb74a313c779370e5fac42f45d0fb5cdba0c
(cherry picked from commit f6b2349e880afa82f9267087fb48b6e4f8a9aa05)
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/46255
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+LibreOffice@googlemail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'sc')
-rw-r--r-- | sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx b/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx index b795802affb6..6c3e7af0c9bf 100644 --- a/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx +++ b/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ ScCompiler::Convention::Convention( FormulaGrammar::AddressConvention eConv ) /* $ */ t[36] = ScCharFlags::CharWord | ScCharFlags::Word | ScCharFlags::CharIdent | ScCharFlags::Ident; if (FormulaGrammar::CONV_ODF == meConv) /* $ */ t[36] |= ScCharFlags::OdfNameMarker; -/* % */ t[37] = ScCharFlags::Value; +/* % */ t[37] = ScCharFlags::Char | ScCharFlags::WordSep | ScCharFlags::ValueSep; /* & */ t[38] = ScCharFlags::Char | ScCharFlags::WordSep | ScCharFlags::ValueSep; /* ' */ t[39] = ScCharFlags::NameSep; /* ( */ t[40] = ScCharFlags::Char | ScCharFlags::WordSep | ScCharFlags::ValueSep; |