summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJustin Luth <justin_luth@sil.org>2022-02-02 10:44:23 +0200
committerAndras Timar <andras.timar@collabora.com>2022-02-14 11:00:06 +0100
commitbf82200e061c82703354cf166877761c3c90e50b (patch)
tree01ef0efae8374b5b54a9448c71157bcf1c3f5c44 /sd
parent764b4d6efd986956a760f20b03993a3591f76bff (diff)
tdf#145868 sd replace: if search changes, restart find/replace
REPLACE is really a replaceAndFind instead of a findAndReplace. Thus, when you changed your search parameter and did a replace, it replaced the previously searched for item, and then found the first instance of the new search parameter. That of course is just wrong. So make sure to verify that the previous search matches the current search competely. However, that doesn't mean that the entire searchItem matches, since we don't want to restart the search just because the replace parameter changed. In my testing, this wasn't an issue for REPLACE_ALL. So the only time we need to worry about the last search result is in a replace once situation. P.S. This commit exposed that mpSearchItem can point to a destructed SvxSearchItem, so this patches unit test will crash if the other 7.4 commit is missing. Change-Id: I7be14d64534018718145c6ac5f8629ff5f2e5611 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/129385 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomaž Vajngerl <quikee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xisco Fauli <xiscofauli@libreoffice.org> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/129630
Diffstat (limited to 'sd')
-rw-r--r--sd/qa/uitest/findReplace/findReplace.py7
-rw-r--r--sd/source/ui/view/Outliner.cxx12
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/sd/qa/uitest/findReplace/findReplace.py b/sd/qa/uitest/findReplace/findReplace.py
index 35afe95d43ee..82e1a4990872 100644
--- a/sd/qa/uitest/findReplace/findReplace.py
+++ b/sd/qa/uitest/findReplace/findReplace.py
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ class findReplace(UITestCase):
self.assertEqual("Replace first first", impress_doc.DrawPages[0].getByIndex(1).String)
self.assertEqual("second", impress_doc.DrawPages[1].getByIndex(1).String)
- # FIXME: tdf#145868
- self.assertEqual("Replace", impress_doc.DrawPages[2].getByIndex(1).String)
+ # tdf#145868 - Third was search for earlier, but never should have been replaced
+ self.assertEqual("Third", impress_doc.DrawPages[2].getByIndex(1).String)
self.assertEqual("Text size 16", impress_doc.DrawPages[3].getByIndex(1).String)
replaceterm = xDialog.getChild("replaceterm")
@@ -100,8 +100,7 @@ class findReplace(UITestCase):
# AssertionError: 'Replace aaa aaa' != 'Replace first first'
self.assertEqual("Replace aaa aaa", impress_doc.DrawPages[0].getByIndex(1).String)
self.assertEqual("second", impress_doc.DrawPages[1].getByIndex(1).String)
- # FIXME: tdf#145868
- self.assertEqual("Replace", impress_doc.DrawPages[2].getByIndex(1).String)
+ self.assertEqual("Third", impress_doc.DrawPages[2].getByIndex(1).String)
self.assertEqual("Text size 16", impress_doc.DrawPages[3].getByIndex(1).String)
# vim: set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab:
diff --git a/sd/source/ui/view/Outliner.cxx b/sd/source/ui/view/Outliner.cxx
index 23353ba87c82..26c8347d5bf5 100644
--- a/sd/source/ui/view/Outliner.cxx
+++ b/sd/source/ui/view/Outliner.cxx
@@ -425,6 +425,18 @@ bool SdOutliner::StartSearchAndReplace (const SvxSearchItem* pSearchItem)
SvxSearchDialogWrapper::SetSearchLabel(SearchLabel::Empty);
mpDrawDocument->GetDocSh()->SetWaitCursor( true );
+
+ // Since REPLACE is really a replaceAndSearchNext instead of a searchAndReplace,
+ // make sure that the search portion has not changed since the last FIND.
+ if (!mbPrepareSpellingPending && mpSearchItem
+ && pSearchItem->GetCommand() == SvxSearchCmd::REPLACE
+ && !mpSearchItem->equalsIgnoring(*pSearchItem, /*bIgnoreReplace=*/true,
+ /*bIgnoreCommand=*/true))
+ {
+ EndSpelling();
+ mbPrepareSpellingPending = true;
+ }
+
if (mbPrepareSpellingPending)
PrepareSpelling();
sd::ViewShellBase* pBase = getViewShellBase();