summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/offapi/com/sun/star/form/XFormsSupplier2.idl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'offapi/com/sun/star/form/XFormsSupplier2.idl')
-rw-r--r--offapi/com/sun/star/form/XFormsSupplier2.idl6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/offapi/com/sun/star/form/XFormsSupplier2.idl b/offapi/com/sun/star/form/XFormsSupplier2.idl
index 2483ed81bdb9..b3e5a072150b 100644
--- a/offapi/com/sun/star/form/XFormsSupplier2.idl
+++ b/offapi/com/sun/star/form/XFormsSupplier2.idl
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ interface XFormsSupplier2: XFormsSupplier
<p>If you need read access to the forms collection, then you might check
the existence of forms using hasForms(), and if it returns
- <FALSE/>, you can do as if <member>XFormsSupplier::getForms</member> would
+ <FALSE/>, you can do as if XFormsSupplier::getForms() would
have returned an empty container.</p>
<p>Semantically, hasForms() is equivalent to calling
- <member>XElementAccess::hasElements</member> on the container returned by
- <member>XFormsSupplier::getForms</member>. But when using the latter, the
+ XElementAccess::hasElements() on the container returned by
+ XFormsSupplier::getForms(). But when using the latter, the
implementation is forced to create a empty container, which might be potentially
expensive.</p>
*/