Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: Ic0a2fd3c1adeb55ec27f6a2eb4709be598120fba
|
|
Change-Id: Icfed3fca931b2d6129b510b6a35a913e88c80778
|
|
Change-Id: I8abc6a31a46bea404e9d8b0c8777e3400dbf928c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5865
Reviewed-by: Thomas Arnhold <thomas@arnhold.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Arnhold <thomas@arnhold.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib728cb9bac3f42e17649685b4413b9335f2dc2c4
|
|
Change-Id: Ibf553adbfe0b892d920e22d3a74d3433b6d6659a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5853
Reviewed-by: Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com>
Tested-by: Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I6d5e8d3fd69189935a3338fee19b60022f70a7eb
|
|
And simplify:
SdrMarkView::ImpTakeDescriptionStr
SdrUndoObj::GetDescriptionStringForObject
ImpTakeDescriptionStr checks for %1 occurence first, this seems to me like an
optimization. So I left it in.
Change-Id: I2d0ecfdf2b83a9a535bd893578837e549dd691c1
|
|
Change-Id: I55c26d99c1aec392dc42ebd635914889efcc1786
|
|
Change-Id: I8c51db8fce8c5eea1ac7bd5751aa7f3212ef1166
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5790
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ia2009331a2df849ed5ace0c6c5f7f2b8e53e1555
|
|
Change-Id: I279d2989e6a3a8f0aa279c5aa8eb13251a6052da
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5801
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I37cb3e43bc7637ba0b749cb6b6671416e979b86b
|
|
Change-Id: I99f619393abc9e2fa7a38a8176084989d063a9ae
|
|
Change-Id: I1734fb6aa100f25e317e15f678f7582353283e73
|
|
m_bPolar no longer used.
And I *believe* >>= now supports bool. So no need to use sal_Bool here.
Change-Id: I3ae3a22fd7c3a1fa05bba17fa3614dfd4020d336
|
|
Let's just keep one target m_xTarget.
Change-Id: Ic9b14179a44371bbc667bd5d851b5d3d8d331eb3
|
|
Change-Id: I187ec2b6bbee10820fcea5b770972fc63b2f7117
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5729
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I3070c0b4fa84090412191415b23e455b9e8d1bbc
|
|
Change-Id: Icd41c465a96e357dca4e50993c899f9365239d8b
|
|
Change-Id: I28ad4fe77c9c8474f4f650e9ea5ab309be307fb5
|
|
Compiler plugin to replace with matching number(), boolean() or OUString ctor,
ran it, few manual tweaks, mark as really deprecated.
Change-Id: I4a79bdbcf4c460d21e73b635d2bd3725c22876b2
|
|
Change-Id: I74238c164e661f0090e78e5c6107b974834a685b
|
|
Change-Id: Id16a2b29b1d6cf02b94cc6c423e2475a9cbeb8a3
|
|
Change-Id: I1b5a0c3f5946aac9d353550091616cf5a31e6f82
|
|
Change-Id: Ia4c81fefc914aaaead6f8e47ae2818e139357bb4
|
|
Change-Id: I1a0e8f92056c24740505e488a318aabd12a4df05
|
|
currently unresizable until all possible tabpages that can be inserted into it
get converted over
Change-Id: I1e7d28cf2f2a04ca2c596136b7d26626058f2e4b
|
|
Change-Id: I7ad2a1bd29afbf4813b1ad984081935ca84ec98a
|
|
Change-Id: I96a1ce5d98b4d51f2cacabe7eac95cabcd38ad28
|
|
Change-Id: I3f5e86dba2df950aeb12c895f52d99274c0959aa
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5148
Reviewed-by: Luboš Luňák <l.lunak@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Luboš Luňák <l.lunak@suse.cz>
|
|
Change-Id: I8d7619e7807ff2d400ec5c7fd181375130245728
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: I2746b92b1360c3c181879a81f653c44ef609f351
|
|
Change-Id: Ib89d2f1321c5a926f67ad473c1612b550025cdfc
|
|
ResId loaders begining to melt away
Change-Id: Ied10d95f6561f24b2305d202847b7e7c39eb63c3
|
|
Change-Id: I97888b8659bb978595157e881c18ce51c1482b46
|
|
Change-Id: Ida1be6cc97e2a96537dddd3c8d6dc91c451adf7a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4906
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib63bf0a67f18cf8e2f3705ae8b096c5bdf06edaf
|
|
Change-Id: Ib1a781b7bf848a092dd000d5999fef00a409d92d
|
|
Gauss elimination is not a stable algorithm so use QR decomposition
(with other methods). Also use horner's method to evaluate a polynomial
which is the prefered and more stable method of polynomial evaluation.
Still this is not quite enough as you still have to multiply very large
number with very small and you lose percision on high-degree polynomials
or big X values. Some methods evaluate the polynomial in barycentric form
but how to get the polynomial into the barycentric form is now the
question.
Change-Id: If0d93bc1f08253f015e814e187b5a2cb7f78ec49
|
|
If no LanguageTag instance is at hand use the static methods to convert
between BCP 47 string, Locale and MS-LangID instead of creating
temporary instances.
Change-Id: I9597f768078eb81c840e84a5db5617f26bb7dc09
|
|
Change-Id: I6f9a1969605e0016b11157ddb5754ac77fd3966b
|
|
Change-Id: I1049249741f445ad7bd9c070f99812c4404597c9
|
|
Change-Id: I9061966e6c86acf94c9a34704567366315baf007
|
|
Change-Id: I2b7ff3e667ce1085676168e19a9c4ce7c404ac0b
|
|
Change-Id: Ib5b84806189b44ca1b4c74c958d0fafa86030c36
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4799
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I36eb559fa58dbe75384b7119c788af0048813aed
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4733
Reviewed-by: Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I82870e452d24b1b6799ba96d42dcfa2446ab2e87
|
|
Added toolbar button for vertical grid. Icon was already prepared.
Changed the button behavior for vertical and horizontal grid button
from just on -> off to cycle through major -> major&minor -> off.
Change-Id: I147fc97ab43db31f08a2e98f7b68422fb168f042
|
|
Change-Id: Ic645195c0fc50a55bb0842fc378a3f329ea2d210
|