Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
* <https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/src/boost_1_75_0.tar.xz> has been generated
(on Fedora 33) with
> $ wget https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.75.0/source/boost_1_75_0.tar.bz2
> $ printf '953db31e016db7bb207f11432bef7df100516eeb746843fa0486a222e3fd49cb boost_1_75_0.tar.bz2' | sha256sum -c # cf. <https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_75_0.html>
> boost_1_75_0.tar.bz2: OK
> $ external/boost/repack_tarball.sh boost_1_75_0.tar.bz2
> Unpacking boost_1_75_0.tar.bz2 ...
> Removing unnecessary files ...
> Creating boost_1_75_0.tar.xz ...
> Cleaning up ...
> cc378a036a1cfd3af289f3da24deeb8dba7a729f61ab104c7b018a622e22d21b boost_1_75_0.tar.xz
> Done.
* external/boost/StaticLibrary_boost_date_time.mk: Even though
date_generators.cpp and greg_weekday.cpp are still present, their function
definitions are now covered by inline function definitions in include files,
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/libs/date_time/src/gregorian/greg_weekday.cpp:23:17: error: redefinition of 'as_short_string'
> greg_weekday::as_short_string() const
> ^
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/date_time/gregorian/greg_weekday.hpp:52:17: note: previous definition is here
> const char* as_short_string() const
> ^
etc. and
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/libs/date_time/src/gregorian/date_generators.cpp:23:36: error: redefinition of 'nth_as_str'
> BOOST_DATE_TIME_DECL const char* nth_as_str(int ele)
> ^
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/date_time/date_generators.hpp:157:22: note: previous definition is here
> inline const char* nth_as_str(int ele)
> ^
* external/boost/StaticLibrary_boost_filesystem.mk now lacked various symbols,
as seen when linking external/liborcus' orcus-parser library:
> "boost::filesystem::emit_error(int, boost::system::error_code*, char const*)", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::emit_error(int, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::system::error_code*, char const*)", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::emit_error(int, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::system::error_code*, char const*)", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::filesystem_error::filesystem_error(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::system::error_code)", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::filesystem_error::filesystem_error(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::system::error_code)", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::filesystem_error::~filesystem_error()", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::detail::dir_itr_close(void*&, void*&)", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::detail::directory_iterator_construct(boost::filesystem::directory_iterator&, boost::filesystem::path const&, unsigned int, boost::system::error_code*)", referenced from:
[...]
> "boost::filesystem::detail::directory_iterator_increment(boost::filesystem::directory_iterator&, boost::system::error_code*)", referenced from:
[...]
> "typeinfo for boost::filesystem::filesystem_error", referenced from:
[...]
* No longer sure why external/boost/gcc9.patch.0 from
e7b8728f5c0292a6c6a18e76220b1769ecf25aa3 "external/boost: silence
-Werror=deprecated-copy (GCC trunk towards GCC 9)" was necessary at all, in
addition to that commit's
> #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-copy"
changes, but at least a build with recent GCC 11 trunk appears to work fine now
without it. (And the patch would no longer have applied as-is.)
* The dropped patches in external/boost/c++20-allocator.patch.0 and
external/boost/clang-cl.patch.0 would no longer have applied as-is, but also
appear not to be needed any more.
* external/boost/include/boost/property_tree/ptree_fwd.hpp became necessary to
silence
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/ptree_fwd.hpp:16,
> from libreofficekit/qa/gtktiledviewer/gtv-helpers.hxx:21,
> from libreofficekit/qa/gtktiledviewer/gtv-application-window.cxx:19:
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/throw_exception.hpp: In instantiation of ‘boost::wrapexcept<E>::wrapexcept(const E&, const boost::source_location&) [with E = boost::property_tree::ptree_bad_data]’:
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/throw_exception.hpp:171:11: required from ‘void boost::throw_exception(const E&, const boost::source_location&) [with E = boost::property_tree::ptree_bad_data]’
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/detail/ptree_implementation.hpp:826:13: required from ‘void boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key, Data, KeyCompare>::put_value(const Type&, Translator) [with Type = char [8]; Translator = boost::property_tree::stream_translator<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>, char [8]>; Key = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; Data = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; KeyCompare = std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >]’
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/detail/ptree_implementation.hpp:845:34: required from ‘boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<K, D, C>& boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key, Data, KeyCompare>::put(const path_type&, const Type&, Translator) [with Type = char [8]; Translator = boost::property_tree::stream_translator<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>, char [8]>; Key = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; Data = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; KeyCompare = std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >; boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key, Data, KeyCompare>::path_type = boost::property_tree::string_path<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>, boost::property_tree::id_translator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > >]’
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/detail/ptree_implementation.hpp:859:19: required from ‘boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<K, D, C>& boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key, Data, KeyCompare>::put(const path_type&, const Type&) [with Type = char [8]; Key = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; Data = std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>; KeyCompare = std::less<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> >; boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key, Data, KeyCompare>::path_type = boost::property_tree::string_path<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>, boost::property_tree::id_translator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char> > >]’
> libreofficekit/qa/gtktiledviewer/gtv-application-window.cxx:300:103: required from here
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/throw_exception.hpp:134:82: error: implicitly-declared ‘boost::property_tree::ptree_bad_data::ptree_bad_data(const boost::property_tree::ptree_bad_data&)’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-copy-dtor]
> 134 | explicit wrapexcept( E const & e, boost::source_location const & loc ): E( e )
> | ^
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/exceptions.hpp:84,
> from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/string_path.hpp:16,
> from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/ptree.hpp:16,
> from external/boost/include/boost/property_tree/ptree.hpp:30,
> from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/json_parser.hpp:14,
> from external/boost/include/boost/property_tree/json_parser.hpp:30,
> from libreofficekit/qa/gtktiledviewer/gtv-application-window.cxx:26:
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/property_tree/detail/exception_implementation.hpp:51:12: note: because ‘boost::property_tree::ptree_bad_data’ has user-provided ‘virtual boost::property_tree::ptree_bad_data::~ptree_bad_data()’
> 51 | inline ptree_bad_data::~ptree_bad_data() throw()
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
etc.
Change-Id: I36fcd04ca6f109910761a5802535a18cfb17ddd9
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/108878
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
The C++ standard leaves it unspecified how ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT is defined, and at
least MS Visual Studio 2017 version 15.9 defines it as {0}, asking for list-
initialization, but std::atomic_flag is no aggregate (it has a default ctor) and
has no suitable ctor for that initializer list. Other standard library
implementations solve that by e.g. adding a std::atomic_flag ctor taking a bool
parameter, and defining ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT as std::atomic_flag(false); but MSVC
apparently relies on some non-standard behavior here that allows to initialize
std::atomic_flag from {0}. But that is apparently not supported by clang-cl,
causing failures like
> [build CXX] workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/libs/locale/src/shared/date_time.cpp
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/libs/locale/src/shared/date_time.cpp:11:
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/thread/locks.hpp:10:
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/thread/lock_algorithms.hpp:11:
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/thread/lock_types.hpp:18:
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/thread/thread_time.hpp:9:
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/date_time/time_clock.hpp:17:
> In file included from external/boost/include\boost/shared_ptr.hpp:27:
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/shared_ptr.hpp:17:
> In file included from workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.hpp:36:
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_pool.hpp(77,5): error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'std::atomic_flag'
> BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT, BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT, BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT, BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT, BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost\boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_std_atomic.hpp(81,38): note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT'
> #define BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT { ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT }
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> C:/PROGRA~2/MIB055~1/2017/COMMUN~1/VC/Tools/MSVC/1416~1.270/Include\atomic(158,26): note: expanded from macro 'ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT'
> #define ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT {0}
> ^~~
> C:/PROGRA~2/MIB055~1/2017/COMMUN~1/VC/Tools/MSVC/1416~1.270/Include\atomic(169,2): note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from 'int' to 'const std::atomic_flag' for 1st argument
> atomic_flag(const atomic_flag&) = delete;
> ^
> C:/PROGRA~2/MIB055~1/2017/COMMUN~1/VC/Tools/MSVC/1416~1.270/Include\atomic(168,2): note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was provided
> atomic_flag() noexcept = default;
> ^
The internals of external/boost appear to be the only place where we currently
use ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT, and we can work around that easily by picking a different
backend in boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock.hpp for the problematic combination
of Clang and _MSC_VER 1916 (which may need to be extended to further MSVC
versions).
Change-Id: Ie6aa62556efbedd3897ad7803b546cb8088ebe10
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/79967
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
<https://dev-www.libreoffice.org/src/boost_1_69_0.tar.bz2> is a copy of
<https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.69.0/source/boost_1_69_0.tar.bz2>,
SHA256 hash as given at <https://www.boost.org/users/download/>.
* removed from external/boost/include/boost/ those files that are no longer
present in workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/
* the shrunk external/boost/rtti.patch.0 can probably be removed completely in a
follow-up commit
* the patch to libs/filesystem/src/operations.cpp in
external/boost/boost-android-unified.patch.1 no longer applied, and appears to
be no longer necessary anyway (seeing a working build without it of
--with-distro=LibreOfficeAndroid and NDK r16b); but with the non-standard
Clang 5.0.300080 from NDK r16b, the build now caused failures like
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/type_traits/detail/is_function_cxx_11.hpp:36:11: error: class template partial specialization contains a template parameter that cannot be deduced; this partial specialization will never be used [-Wunusable-partial-specialization]
> struct is_function<Ret BOOST_TT_DEF_CALL(Args...)BOOST_TT_NOEXCEPT_DECL> : public true_type {};
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/type_traits/detail/is_function_cxx_11.hpp:35:38: note: non-deducible template parameter 'NE'
> template <class Ret, class...Args BOOST_TT_NOEXCEPT_PARAM>
> ^
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/type_traits/detail/is_function_cxx_11.hpp:22:40: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_TT_NOEXCEPT_PARAM'
> #define BOOST_TT_NOEXCEPT_PARAM , bool NE
> ^
showing that that version of Clang has the same problem handling noexcept(b)
as a deduced template parameter as MSVC has, as already supported by the code
* new external/boost/sse.patch.0 needed on Windows x86 to silence errors like
> C:\cygwin\home\tdf\lode\jenkins\workspace\gerrit_windows\workdir\UnpackedTarball\boost\boost/type_traits/detail/is_function_cxx_11.hpp(111): error C2215: '__vectorcall' cannot be used with '/arch:SSE'
(<https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_windows/26117/>); according to
<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/predefined-macros
?view=vs-2017>: "_M_IX86_FP Defined as an integer literal value that indicates
the /arch compiler option that was set, or the default. This macro is always
defined when the compilation target is an x86 processor. Otherwise, undefined.
When defined, the value is: [...] 1 if the /arch:SSE compiler option was set."
and we specify /arch:SSE explicitly for Windows x86 since
8bd6bf93b7711a7ac7c5cbd7c3bb980481570ebd "fdo#82430: configure: MSVC build:
avoid using SSE2 instructions"
* boost::logic::tribool conversion operator to bool is explicit now
Change-Id: Iea49560d734f545539f062dce46740fbf812dd84
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/66189
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...after 206b8c4ae320d7d8614f21800d8f77fa29f8f5ff "On Windows, check for at
least Visual Studio 2017 version 15.7"
Change-Id: I38ee86e1649bbdc828a7e328f2dbbac0dc163c8a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/64250
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
This claims to support Visual Studio 2017.4, but not the current
2017.5.
* remove boost.auto_link.patch; it does not apply; not sure why we
need this if we can just define BOOST_ALL_NO_LIB
(see commit 7f2e168421c3cd928a31a52a8b5afe97e931d3ba)
* remove some hunks from clang-cl.patch.0 that look fixed upstream
* add a global workaround for spurious GCC warning:
oox/source/drawingml/shape.cxx:921:54: error:
‘oShadowColor.boost::optional_detail::tc_optional_base<int>::m_storage’
may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
aFormat.Color = *oShadowColor;
Change-Id: I1eb1d8b66554a84a7d7269f1faaa98695fe2f501
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/48187
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>
|
|
...<https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.1/source/boost_1_65_1.tar.bz2>.
One reason to upgrade is that with 1.63 CppunitTest_tools_test started to fail
with -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow after
331e2e5ed3bf4e0b2c1fab3b7bca836170317827 "long->sal_Int32 in Fraction",
> workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/integer/common_factor_rt.hpp:300:5: runtime error: negation of -2147483648 cannot be represented in type 'int'; cast to an unsigned type to negate this value to itself
> #0 0x7f0f99bea71b in boost::integer::detail::gcd_optimal_evaluator<int>::operator()(int, int) const workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/integer/common_factor_rt.hpp:300:5
> #1 0x7f0f99bea52a in int boost::integer::detail::gcd_optimal<int>(int const&, int const&) workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/integer/common_factor_rt.hpp:372:16
> #2 0x7f0f99be7d70 in int boost::integer::gcd<int>(int const&, int const&) workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/integer/common_factor_rt.hpp:435:12
> #3 0x7f0f99be7620 in boost::rational<int>::normalize() workdir/UnpackedTarball/boost/boost/rational.hpp:559:17
> #4 0x7f0f99bdff29 in rational_FromDouble(double) tools/source/generic/fract.cxx:449:12
> #5 0x7f0f99bdf8b4 in Fraction::Fraction(double) tools/source/generic/fract.cxx:93:25
> #6 0x7f0f9a1bb987 in tools::FractionTest::testMinLongDouble() tools/qa/cppunit/test_fract.cxx:79:18
> #7 0x7f0f9a1bddd2 in void std::_Bind<std::_Mem_fn<void (tools::FractionTest::*)()> (tools::FractionTest*)>::__call<void, , 0ul>(std::tuple<>&&, std::_Index_tuple<0ul>) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1/../../../../include/c++/6.4.1/functional:933:11
> #8 0x7f0f9a1bdbe9 in void std::_Bind<std::_Mem_fn<void (tools::FractionTest::*)()> (tools::FractionTest*)>::operator()<, void>() /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/6.4.1/../../../../include/c++/6.4.1/functional:991:17
> #9 0x7f0fa5eb53b0 in CppUnit::TestCaseMethodFunctor::operator()() const workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestCase.cpp:32:5
> #10 0x7f0fa5e1bd1b in CppUnit::DefaultProtector::protect(CppUnit::Functor const&, CppUnit::ProtectorContext const&) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/DefaultProtector.cpp:15:12
> #11 0x7f0fa5e8653d in CppUnit::ProtectorChain::ProtectFunctor::operator()() const workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/ProtectorChain.cpp:20:25
> #12 0x7f0fa5e7fb7c in CppUnit::ProtectorChain::protect(CppUnit::Functor const&, CppUnit::ProtectorContext const&) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/ProtectorChain.cpp:86:18
> #13 0x7f0fa5f17fe0 in CppUnit::TestResult::protect(CppUnit::Functor const&, CppUnit::Test*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestResult.cpp:182:28
> #14 0x7f0fa5eb398c in CppUnit::TestCase::run(CppUnit::TestResult*) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestCase.cpp:91:13
> #15 0x7f0fa5eb7887 in CppUnit::TestComposite::doRunChildTests(CppUnit::TestResult*) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestComposite.cpp:64:30
> #16 0x7f0fa5eb6a78 in CppUnit::TestComposite::run(CppUnit::TestResult*) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestComposite.cpp:23:3
> #17 0x7f0fa5eb7887 in CppUnit::TestComposite::doRunChildTests(CppUnit::TestResult*) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestComposite.cpp:64:30
> #18 0x7f0fa5eb6a78 in CppUnit::TestComposite::run(CppUnit::TestResult*) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestComposite.cpp:23:3
> #19 0x7f0fa5f46655 in CppUnit::TestRunner::WrappingSuite::run(CppUnit::TestResult*) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestRunner.cpp:47:27
> #20 0x7f0fa5f16a66 in CppUnit::TestResult::runTest(CppUnit::Test*) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestResult.cpp:149:9
> #21 0x7f0fa5f475c6 in CppUnit::TestRunner::run(CppUnit::TestResult&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) workdir/UnpackedTarball/cppunit/src/cppunit/TestRunner.cpp:96:14
> #22 0x534a01 in (anonymous namespace)::ProtectedFixtureFunctor::run() const sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:316:20
> #23 0x532ac4 in sal_main() sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:466:20
> #24 0x5324f2 in main sal/cppunittester/cppunittester.cxx:373:1
> #25 0x7f0fa436e430 in __libc_start_main /usr/src/debug/glibc-2.24-66-gd5a4092c36/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:289
> #26 0x4387b9 in _start (workdir/LinkTarget/Executable/cppunittester+0x4387b9)
Change-Id: Id1c3b216ee18c1d622768dc960ac257d5415c664
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/42427
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7f896bb9650f68626b4bcfe96c9c41fafeab436a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/33827
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
|
|
...which are no longer necessary after e5c6574f5df8d2a5914beb03dce604beb8d62ee8
"boost: warning-patch-ectomy"
Change-Id: I4e79a4c7b9b20f9b49dc05e6a86831837aa4bbf0
|
|
Upstream maintainers, with few exceptions, generally don't care about
warnings in boost headers, hence we re-base our warning fix patches on
every upgrade, which is a pointless exercise in frustration.
Most of the patches are for GCC/Clang warnings, where we could use
-isystem to suppress the warnings (with corresponding hacks in the build
system, because -isystem also disables dependency generation) - but
clang-cl does not support -isystem.
So generate a bunch of wrapper headers into external/boost/include, that
disable all known warnings and use #include_next to get the real boost
header. This allows us to get rid of most of the existing patches.
There is however a bug in GCC that preprocessor warnings like -Wundef
cannot be disabled with a #pragma, so those patches cannot be removed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Change-Id: I2992bf4a463015f1140489df867bd80757f84541
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/25563
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I62b1e2f5b4918514a7a04bb6a44e55fc21a475af
|
|
Change-Id: If079016bf90d593886c11366626f7c4a06ede8be
|
|
* Avoid errors about (somewhat different, but apparently in a way that MSVC
doesn't care) redeclarations of system header stuff (and working around that
with BOOST_USE_WINDOWS_H would lead to other problems).
* Need the workaround for broken MSVC 2010 STL iterator taxonomy for clang-cl,
too.
Change-Id: I4f9c9b5cc8a19856cc409450aac1fb1baa5554c9
|
|
Change-Id: I819be5efb25632d26fe49a71dbc07fe16e4914b1
|
|
Change-Id: Ib07e85bd1a157b6fa78f07a17f8cf5033b01bddf
|