Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: I534848c4be8eadf86b7f31ac742a80982405f56f
|
|
Change-Id: Ied1b4f81e2e851b639cc9a514659160b8571e92f
|
|
Change-Id: I75cfb96e4afd69fd0f6a6716ce4be282aa8d3b14
|
|
Change-Id: I92eb6d136fc117f4694aa2cf88d93d4486855618
|
|
Change-Id: I0333f65f67cdd93f9773e6d738289e36353ef359
|
|
Change-Id: I90b205bef1b01e6c4c43788fc5c95391b7842e83
|
|
Change-Id: Ib3e10d188c3f0d1bde40653d783f98ebfaed423c
|
|
and remove some more unused out of tests code
Change-Id: Ie63b03d1de754038d5477112ddfc9266dbf93709
|
|
Change-Id: Ice2d2f8b565bfac6079a2d58c0d25f0352524b71
|
|
Change-Id: Ifd9906e7288c613eb2ac6cde7ca8bc7607f349fa
|
|
Change-Id: If4d1a933f5ebf2154c377ef9a8596eb0962d43d3
|
|
Change-Id: I8a8594084eb5f4c8521cc4b73a94da6259069516
|
|
we were reusing the stride of the surface we were cloning,
but the new surface has a different underlying size.
remove the custom stride argument and just change our stride
calculation to use the same scheme that cairo and GDI uses, which
remove another platform/drawing-system variable
Change-Id: I257dac9757b121642e9ccfde7db0911edc9f3fb1
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/20149
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9fa22b06fabf79043ebc68be7afebc6e810f4db1
|
|
Change-Id: I9b4f884c6313a53fea543ea6f93175205351ad14
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/18517
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9e89fea4e94a91edbbe355780c2a12d6e6cb6e4a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/16728
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
so we could create bitmap devices that have the same stride that cairo expects,
provide getBitmapDeviceStrideForWidth to get a default value
Change-Id: I7ecc6f54a734b3f6bed59c699ac3b482c4ad7c47
|
|
Change-Id: I844532d08123ed0c91ccec73cc806277fd821089
|
|
Change-Id: I1ab4e23b0539f8d39974787f226e57a21f96e959
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12164
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ia43976d84eede6f699381bc4f3daf89b95e4cb4f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/12150
Reviewed-by: Bryan Quigley <gquigs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>
|
|
This was some staggering proportion of tiled rendering documents
with complex clipping; it seems 'clear' is not what memset is for
1bit clip masks.
Change-Id: I9142ffb7d7016603feb7782d6f03b9992b9494e3
|
|
Change-Id: I4067c5039c7b5c74a1c144721dd7260de54dd2bf
|
|
Equality test also needs to check if disjunct BitmapDevice instances
might not actually share the same memory buffer.
Change-Id: I09a93cb092a0039353be211ed053e991e7fe66f0
|
|
see https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3367/
and Change-Id: I00c96fa77d04b33a6f8c8cd3490dfcd9bdc9e84a for details
Change-Id: I199a75bc4042af20817265d5ef85b1134a96ff5a
|