| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I646d55ee80ceeefbb3647ec64278460cc5af579f
|
|
Change-Id: I1fdbe47ed7a6e05d2cf20f4c296bffad4bbc6599
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/13719
Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Iff55c88a365859400e87f3333735e54ba59811b6
|
|
Change-Id: Ibbcdb4a3f46b7491396a1b1c7b4cdc1af05f30d3
|
|
...to improve diagnosing misuses of boolean expressions in client code (cf.
compilerplugins/clang/implicitboolconversion.cxx). This change should be
transparent to client code.
Change-Id: Ibf43c5ded609b489952e1cc666cac1e72ffa2386
|
|
Change-Id: Idb0ca4bcefea4c1927e8238d3371c9044103239f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/6651
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ibd5d8af00f6582d53231c76e2b04e737b5804497
|
|
...so move it from osl/mutex.hxx to its own comphelper/solarmutex.hxx. It looks
like a newbie mistake that 59e7685d8d812ee8773f57475cbe3aa2a0bdfc81 "Create an
abstract interface to be used to implement a SolarMutex" put it here in the
first place.
I do not consider this an incompatible change really, as no external URE client
code should have used SolarMutex anyway.
(Also included some clean up, like removing unused
{Clearable,Resettable}SolarGuard, and spelling out SolarGuard in the few places
it is used.)
Change-Id: I121ffb5b7cefbc19e88b5405e5a85ffc895be852
|
|
Change-Id: Ib48a12e902f2311c295b2007f08f44dee28f431d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3499
Reviewed-by: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
Tested-by: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
|
