Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
It appears that the C++ standard allows overriding destructors to be marked
"override," but at least some MSVC versions complain about it, so at least make
sure such destructors are explicitly marked "virtual."
Change-Id: I0e1cafa7584fd16ebdce61f569eae2373a71b0a1
|
|
...mostly done with a rewriting Clang plugin, with just some manual tweaking
necessary to fix poor macro usage.
Change-Id: Ie656f9d653fc716f72ac175925272696d509038f
|
|
Change-Id: Ibe154941e00176cde06b1fe69864da4ae6bdee95
|
|
Change-Id: I5335182ea16695c77c2855b34c98220aea2befa1
|
|
Change-Id: I2c280be12f36c1538e922286745aabc62482423d
|
|
The time when it made sense to use "clever" #ifdefs to, for performance or
compiler reasons, conditionally bypass private parts of a class declaration
passed a decade or longer ago.
Still more of this in sw and sc. People working on those modules might want to
do it too, or not.
Change-Id: I1053139ca5e5e2631f7b22d99d3bada54fc337be
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3627
Tested-by: LibreOffice gerrit bot <gerrit@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
Tested-by: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
|
|
see https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3367/
and Change-Id: I00c96fa77d04b33a6f8c8cd3490dfcd9bdc9e84a for details
Change-Id: I199a75bc4042af20817265d5ef85b1134a96ff5a
|