Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
some parts of the OString seem to have fallen behind
its more popular sibling OUString.
Change-Id: Ie6d64c3005b2df5da49ba79d0c38282dd5057a23
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/114252
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
which is often a useful indicator that the callers can be made to use
std::unique_ptr
Change-Id: Idb1745d1f58dbcf389c9f60f1a5728d7d092ade5
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/56238
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
when we see a unaryoperator, unless it's one of a small set, we can
know (mostly) that the field will not be written.
there is still a small risk of false+ with code taking references
via conditional expressions.
Change-Id: I96fa808067576a50e5eaf425338e225b4e0bdd4e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/53263
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: Ied469752391afeca365838f83b35e75143b7cf65
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/46223
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: Iea28debc7d3abc58cca21bd3856cb65b321dc1e6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/33693
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: I27842162fcf82120ecb811ee8e89e187430931fc
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/28931
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: I328ac7a95ccc87732efae48b567a0556865928f3
|
|
Change-Id: I45f5489233879126d4f9ee3d01db504d950bb597
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/16656
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I4e264af4bb8d5fcd53666922fc4ef24a863ac8f3
|
|
Change-Id: I8f29f6344592c2bb1ae0d03304cf6e18b6df3a29
|
|
Change-Id: Ie10ee80f1d35b40c0baf9d7ba5c1181b52405b5f
|
|
Change-Id: I5fa6608861b7049ad3964b695b0622ab583397d1
|
|
Change-Id: I5f44f041e465230d10d562e8bd6f141848465e07
|
|
Change-Id: I2a2cc56cf005f564c798b8d43ef7e8c4b7f9eeff
|
|
Change-Id: I6a92196f33d7a5278c7dcc426112e9c56d582655
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4627
Reviewed-by: Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>
|
|
The time when it made sense to use "clever" #ifdefs to, for performance or
compiler reasons, conditionally bypass private parts of a class declaration
passed a decade or longer ago.
Still more of this in sw and sc. People working on those modules might want to
do it too, or not.
Change-Id: I1053139ca5e5e2631f7b22d99d3bada54fc337be
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3627
Tested-by: LibreOffice gerrit bot <gerrit@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
Tested-by: David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>
|
|
see https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/3367/
and Change-Id: I00c96fa77d04b33a6f8c8cd3490dfcd9bdc9e84a for details
Change-Id: I199a75bc4042af20817265d5ef85b1134a96ff5a
|