| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Found with bin/find-unneeded-includes
Only removal proposals are dealt with here.
Change-Id: Ib32ea54a3fa690a0722fa75ddb4121ec78c0b64f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/65386
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
|
|
<sberg> noelgrandin, just happen to look at b14224fe again; looks a bit scary to remove == or != from cases where both where declared
<noelgrandin> sberg, ok, I can revert that part
<sberg> noelgrandin, I guess that would be safer (there could be cases where now a different overload could kick in)
Change-Id: I5dc41c05dc4439d5adee0e5b3e0a9e1dfb9de3af
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22211
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
using an idea from dtardon:
<dtardon> noelgrandin, hi. could you try to run the unusedmethods clang
plugin with "make build-nocheck"? that would catch functions that are
only used in tests. e.g., i just removed the whole o3tl::range class,
which has not been used in many years, but htere was a test for it...
<noelgrandin> dtardon, interesting idea! Sure, I can do that.
Change-Id: I5653953a426a2186a1e43017212d87ffce520387
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22041
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Id3b155abec7b7a2ff43d0a35e98709f5ee51c6b9
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/21069
Reviewed-by: Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chris Sherlock <chris.sherlock79@gmail.com>
|
