Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Loongarch is a new RISC ISA , which includes a 32-bit version and a 64-bit version, Here are some documents about Loongarch:
https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation.
The loongarch64 bridges implementation refers to mips64 bridges, and the code related to abi and asm has been modified
Change-Id: I1d9cd3aadf63046c8cdecc9a64842567bfa1cecc
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/137486
Tested-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I8636102554a76f2ba3f6297219b40761473a4489
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/137285
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: I6e19d4d03957c35caa79a231927eae04ae630442
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/136209
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
found by inspecting call sites of OUString::getToken
Change-Id: I4269c7476c7aa46fac39528227e350568f0eb34a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/132644
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
...which had been removed in 18bdf78e156f3cd1e6ccbb3ae28e919583bac70c "Azul is
just another OpenJDK variant", when fixing the previously mis-classified Azul
JRE from "uses OtherInfo" to "uses SunInfo". But the IBM Semeru Runtime
(<https://developer.ibm.com/languages/java/semeru-runtimes/downloads/>) is
another arguably mis-classified case due to its java.vendor of "IBM Corporation"
(and where the
VENDOR_MAP_ENTRY<OtherInfo>("IBM Corporation"),
line in jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/vendorlist.cxx might be relevant for
some other JRE from IBM; at least, that entry is present ever since the
introduction of vendorlist.cxx in 738e9b77b9d181b376188e405e1eb353cf93c597
"INTEGRATION: CWS jl8").
So just generally support the bin/server/jvm.dll path here for "uses OtherInfo",
even though it should actually only be necessary for "uses SunInfo".
(See the mail thread starting at
<https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/2022/msg00246.html>
"[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 7.3.3.2 Windows 64 bit seems not detect
AdoptOpenJdk JRE Windows 64 bit runtime".)
Change-Id: I3a4d02309b7c833c3cd32dc2dda4f4cb7b216693
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133827
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I05f3b171578b8fef5b15dcbbf10ae9b7cf2d1b02
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133075
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
for which we have o3tl:: equivalents
Change-Id: I4670fd8b703ac47214be213f41e88d1c6ede7032
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/132913
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
look for call sequences that can use string_view and the new o3tl
functions in o3tl/string_view.hxx
Also add a few more wrappers to said #include file
Change-Id: I05d8752cc67a7b55b0b57e8eed803bd06bfcd9ea
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/132840
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: I62a7534844006a7bf3c2ece5e5d2f8b739a15b9f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/132762
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...like "11.0.14.1" reported now by
java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.14.1.1-5.fc35.x86_64, and which caused
> warn:jfw:274674:274674:jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/sunjre.cxx:100: [Java framework] sunjavaplugin.so does not know the version: 11.0.14.1 as valid for a SUN/Oracle JRE.
(For simplicity, cover it with the same code block that already covers a
potential "_01" etc. part following the official(?) three dotted segments.)
Change-Id: Id98235d3be59653ab412f9b6c1ffbf3b0470bd6f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131586
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
look for potentially trivial destructors that can then be elided
Change-Id: I435c251bd4291b5864c20d68f88676faac7c43fb
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131318
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: I3f31f223b6e906c6b40415a8d5c66c27e3c7cff5
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/130338
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...that had been added in 811de66d7fd8c93c43d8e4e2dc73720033ba939b "First
attempt at getting access to the Java VM on Android", together with another
fprintf(stderr, "Got lo_get_javavm = %p", lo_get_javavm);
that had meanwhile been removed again in
5510127e89d6971a219ce3664e4631d6c6dda2b1 "Android code refactorig and hacking"
Change-Id: I1a50563e2af1ea5a0ecbd2cc9d49d70c6e5bbbd3
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/130337
Reviewed-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Jenkins
|
|
Change-Id: Idcfe7321077b60381c0273910b1faeb444ef1fd8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/130242
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
See tdf#42949 for motivation
Change-Id: I758bb27e93779e3df21c463714e49354748f446f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/128715
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Thorsten Behrens <thorsten.behrens@allotropia.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I231195c36d620254cbcd2f4d7bbb9044f7887fe8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/126413
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
...ever since 61c4f96d6ae6a80370774e53287edb27cbce8067 "Support AdoptOpenJDK":
At least the old AdoptOpenJDK 1.8.0_275 I had lying around on macOS reported it
as "AdoptOpenJDK", not "AdoptOpenJdk". But instead of fixing all occurences of
"AdoptOpenJdk", we can just as well get rid of that vendor listing completely
now after 3d27b2fa9c5a03f78e5145377402f8a88e3da1be "tdf#124503: Support JRE
installations with unknown java.vendor property" and
3460c16d7f749d8d2a59d8b927df5ec31f64a083 "Make getVersionInformation always
return a VersionInfo ...even for JREs not listed in javavendors.xml, making it
default to a VersionInfo with sMinVersion = "1.8.0". (For a rationale for not
updating the <updated> elements of the modified
jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/javavendors_*.xml see the commit message of
95c38f6d77f1cb6ff3dc229c5e7130b2e732891d "Drop support for dead GNU Java".)
Change-Id: Iea34914201f604a0665a86dd07724628fa021c90
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/125402
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Lets extend it only to macOS (where there is some confusion now with Rosetta-
translated vs. native processes on Apple M1 machines), not to all Unix-like OSs:
The comment that it "is not defined what the exact [os.arch] values are" is
still relevant. At least for OpenJDK, while Windows has a hardcoded list of
possible values in GetJavaProperties at
<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/9604ee82690f89320614b37bfef4178abc869777/src/java.base/windows/native/libjava/java_props_md.c#L568>,
the corresponding non-Windows code in GetJavaProperties at
<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/319a3b994703aac84df7bcde272adfcb3cdbbbf0/jdk/src/solaris/native/java/lang/java_props_md.c#L175>
uses ARCHPROPNAME which, via
> -DARCHPROPNAME='"$(OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU_OSARCH)"'
at
<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/c363db8ed00ff27eadf06294364d908d6a7d03a6/jdk/makefiles/CompileNativeLibraries.gmk#L185>,
appears to somehow come out of Autoconf at
<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/228c21635b011fbf956b83a0b07fc297e9a34c46/common/autoconf/spec.gmk.in#L93>,
so probably can show some variance in actual values being used.
Change-Id: I16725cd9365f6bd034372c653aa43ab84d487b98
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/125401
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...otherwise if one such JRE had found its way into a user's configuration,
"Tools - Options... - LibreOffice - Advanced" would no longer show *any* JREs.
Regression introduced with 9143dd4ebe37b608e43d04434cf831624bf55b65 "Related
tdf#54443 List only matching JREs", which added WrongArch to the javaPluginError
enum.
Change-Id: I51fd47e585c6686be7a9282615c0978e4f6c460b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/125396
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I049148d82eb306e8ba7fdc9f0cc650f45b05da0c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/125257
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
The commit message of e529461bcb126e0975ffa3f86e1fd5a630551de2 "Enable JVM also
on macOS ARM64" had identified
<https://cdn.azul.com/zulu/bin/zulu17.0.63-ea-jdk17.0.0-ea.27-macosx_aarch64.zip>
"to work reliably now" while other (older Zulu) JVMs "have always crashed with
SIGBUS that smelled like our uses of pthread_jit_write_protect_np in
bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx colided with corresponding calls
in the in-process JVM". Those observations would be in line with
<http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/391> "JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port" only
implemented for Java 17 now (see
<https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/dbc9e4b50cdda35f5712deaf440c49f50b9edc96>
"8253795: Implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port").
So for macOS ARM64 assume that all OpenJDK variants (i.e., providing an empty
jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/javavendors_macosx_aarch64.xml) of at least
Java 17 (i.e., building on recent 3460c16d7f749d8d2a59d8b927df5ec31f64a083
"Make getVersionInformation always return a VersionInfo" and "change the
hardcoded '1.8.0' to '17' for just that one platform") work.
Change-Id: I11e8ba232cee066a25a49edebd0cc50e24e84124
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123989
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...even for JREs not listed in javavendors.xml, making it default to a
VersionInfo with sMinVersion = "1.8.0".
3d27b2fa9c5a03f78e5145377402f8a88e3da1be "tdf#124503: Support JRE installations
with unknown java.vendor property", which had changed getVersionInformation to
return an optional<VersionInfo>, said in the commit message: "For simplicity,
assume that any versions of such JREs are supported. Our baseline is Java 6,
and there are unlikely any older versions of JREs from unknown vendors out
there." Our baseline is Java 8 by now, and there are still unlikely any older
JREs out there, but for macOS ARM64 we may want to restrict to at least Java 17
implementing <http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/391> "JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port",
and this commit is a prerequisite for such a change (where we would then e.g.
change the hardcoded "1.8.0" to "17" for just that one platform).
(OtherInfo::compareVersions in jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/otherjre.cxx
unconditionally returns 0, meaning "versions compare equal", so introducing a
default version of "1.8.0" should have no negative effect on any JREs that use
OtherInfo.)
Change-Id: I34dc5f2b755c2254a91d42c262786ceec70c746e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123958
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...which no longer worked anyway at least since
aafc10c9edb61e13ac557c7e43c8d4a31dce4f37 "Bump Java baseline to Java 8":
According to <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Compiler_for_Java>, the last
version of GCC providing Java was GCC 6.5. But trying to add a build of that
("Tools - Options... - LibreOffice - Advanced - Java Options - Add...") would
already have failed before this commit due to a java.lang.ClassFormatError
("JREProperties (unrecognized class file version)") when executing the
JREProperties code compiled with --release 8. (Whereas now it fails because it
cannot even determine a JRE installation there according to the SunInfo rather
than GnuInfo rules used for the now-unknown vendor.)
The <updated> elements of the modified
jvmfwk/distributions/OpenOfficeorg/javavendors_*.xml have not been updated in
line with the rules documented at the end of jvmfwk/README.md: As mentioned
above, a GNU Java JRE cannot have been selected prior to this commit anyway, so
even though this is nominally an incompatible change of the xml files,
actually updating <updated> would only have negative ("just annoying if an
already selected JRE is still supported") but no positive consequences.
Change-Id: Ica245677dae977360bdb3c6544897eb060c3f844
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123906
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...so there was no good reason for 0f95f8ffd7a3685ca53876005a9c96f2e2e7bc99
"Support Azul Zulu JRE (at least on Windows)" to map it to OtherInfo rather than
SunInfo. (That way, it benefits from SunInfo::compareVersions's proper
implementation, unlike OtherInfo::compareVersions which always returns 0.
Although trying to add e.g. the too-old Java 7
<https://cdn.azul.com/zulu/bin/zulu7.50.0.11-ca-jdk7.0.322-linux_x64.tar.gz>
would already have failed before this commit due to a
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError when executing the JREProperties code.)
This also reverts all the "needed by Azul" additions in
OtherInfo::getRuntimePaths; it is unlikely that any of the other JREs using
OtherInfo silently also benefited from them, and JREs of unknown vendor use
SunInfo (which does have those two paths already, as they are not only needed by
Azul there).
Change-Id: I4af9b4b9e65cd2346011522c105cfc62ec59f552
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123874
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I78970269bfd3eb7ad6b069ac99eeee707619d3e4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123416
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
...for LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY, instead of having them as additional overloads. That
way, loplugin:bufferadd and loplugin:stringviewparam found many further
opportunities for simplification (all addressed here). Some notes:
* There is no longer an implicit conversion from O[U]String to O[U]StringBuffer
(as that goes via user-defined conversions through string_view now), which was
most noticeable in copy initializations like
OStringBuffer buf = someStr;
that had to be changed to direct initialization,
OStringBuffer buf(someStr);
But then again, it wasn't too many places that were affected and I think we can
live with that.
* I made the O[U]StringBuffer ctors taking string_view non-explicit, mainly to
get them in line with their counterparts taking O[U]String.
* I added an OUStringBuffer::lastIndexOf string_view overload that was missing
(relative to OUStringBuffer::indexOf).
* loplugin:stringconstant needed some addition to keep the
compilerplugins/clang/test/stringconstant.cxx checks related to
OStringBuffer::append and OStringBuffer::insert working.
* loplugin:stringviewparam no longer needs the special O[U]StringBuffer-related
code that had been introduced in 1250aecd71fabde4dba990bfceb61bbe8e06b8ea
"loplugin:stringviewparam extend to new.."
Change-Id: Ib1bb8c4632d99b744e742605a9fef6eae959fd72
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/122904
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I3c28651779f17e1a410505ffaa863b4773037ccf
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123119
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>
|
|
Change-Id: I78339f1df1f0c55c7edaa552940b07d1ada3aeb5
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/121386
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Exception looks like this:
java stack trace:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: zulu11\bin\fontmanager.dll: Can't find depende
nt libraries
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load0(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(ClassLoader.java:2442)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:2498)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:2694)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:2648)
at java.base/java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:830)
at java.base/java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1873)
at java.desktop/sun.font.FontManagerNativeLibrary$1.run(FontManagerNativeLibrary.java:57)
at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.desktop/sun.font.FontManagerNativeLibrary.<clinit>(FontManagerNativeLibrary.java:32)
at java.desktop/sun.font.SunFontManager$1.run(SunFontManager.java:279)
at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.desktop/sun.font.SunFontManager.<clinit>(SunFontManager.java:275)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:398)
at java.desktop/sun.font.FontManagerFactory$1.run(FontManagerFactory.java:82)
at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.desktop/sun.font.FontManagerFactory.getInstance(FontManagerFactory.java:74)
at java.desktop/sun.java2d.SunGraphicsEnvironment.getFontManagerForSGE(SunGraphicsEnvironment.ja
va:189)
at java.desktop/sun.java2d.SunGraphicsEnvironment.getAvailableFontFamilyNames(SunGraphicsEnviron
ment.java:223)
at java.desktop/sun.java2d.SunGraphicsEnvironment.getAvailableFontFamilyNames(SunGraphicsEnviron
ment.java:251)
Change-Id: I7a16bb5813d4c089ddb4de34a250280cf6fee137
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/119880
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Samuel Mehrbrodt <samuel.mehrbrodt@allotropia.de>
|
|
mostly by doing
$ git grep -l '#define.*\"' -- *.cxx
| xargs perl -pi -e
's/^#define\s+(\w+)\s+(\".*\")/constexpr OUStringLiteral \1 =
u\2;/g'
Change-Id: Idface893449b0ef2a3c5254865a300585d752fbb
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/119669
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: Iae559ca8bee9650c01167a4d1b918e18cbf03c28
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/118660
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...and move "10.0", "10.10", and "1.5.0_010" from badVersions[] to good
versions[] to make the test succeed (assuming these shall indeed be classified
as good by now, presumably due to changes to the SunVersion implementation in
the meantime)
Change-Id: Ia7cf9b0e607743a5e0534078c0221c1423f6cfb3
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/118570
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
This reverts commit b3541dea4889b9d0039554f87bd16e55189cf8b1.
Reason for revert: The code did not just deal with text encoding differences, but also with properties whose value contains line breaks.
For example, OpenJ9 has line breaks in "java.vm.info" and "java.fullversion", which now trigger asserts; also there is "line.separator" but this one happened not to cause problems so far.
Change-Id: I3ded8e824e96b6fcf21677dd9ba72cbf58c1d261
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/118495
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
My previous attempts of `make check` and running a --with-java build against
various Azul JDK 13--17 have always crashed with SIGBUS that smelled like our
uses of pthread_jit_write_protect_np in
bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx colided with corresponding calls
in the in-process JVM, randomly(?) causing some attempts of running generated
code to SIGBUS. (See the email thread starting at
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2020-December/086490.html>
"Using Java on macOS ARM64".)
But at least with the recent
<https://cdn.azul.com/zulu/bin/zulu17.0.63-ea-jdk17.0.0-ea.27-macosx_aarch64.zip>
on macOS 11.4, this appears to work reliably now: Multiple `make check
screenshot` as well as some manual use of LibreOffice did not run into any such
issues.
Change-Id: I2b1327e7e877ed71420c174c1d88e68a96b3532e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/118114
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Issue the "instead of O[U]String, pass [u16]string_view" diagnostic also for
operator call arguments. (The "rather than copy, pass subView()" diagnostic is
already part of handleSubExprThatCouldBeView, so no need to repeat it explicitly
for operator call arguments.)
(And many call sites don't even require an explicit [u16]string_view, esp. with
the recent ad48b2b02f83eed41fb1eb8d16de7e804156fcf1 "Optimized OString operator
+= overloads". Just some test code in sal/qa/ that explicitly tests the
O[U]String functionality had to be excluded.)
Change-Id: I8d55ba5a7fa16a563f5ffe43d245125c88c793bc
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/115589
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
... and so possibly can rely on -Dfile.encoding=UTF8 now.
This reverts 79ac0685de0b19d856db70a208a8372cb589646c
and 3428bace79d64a10cfcabb79e4caa608ee5db233.
Change-Id: Ia9e09025691b200c0f79427e0f4efe500f9c81f8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/115272
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I656f06a74d9f0180ae460264563d6a935c7d2c60
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/114377
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
* Updated README.md contents to fix various issues
* Fixed source links by using [git:], processed by mkdocs scripts
* Added README.md for ios, setup_native, unotest
* Fixed issues with "underline" and "less than" sign
Change-Id: I3e52a1d3372586c390ee6c42a2ef48bbabc81398
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/114248
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
|
|
Previously, all of the README files have been renamed to README.md
and now, the contents of these files were changed to use Markdown
format. Other than format inconsistency, some README.md files lacked
information about modules, or were out of date. By using LibreOffice
/ OpenOffice wiki and other documentation websites, these files were
updated. Now every README.md file has a title, and some description.
The top-level README.md file is changed to add links to the modules.
The result of processing the Markdown format README.md files can be
seen at: https://docs.libreoffice.org/
Change-Id: Ic3b0c3c064a2498d6a435253b041df010cd7797a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/113424
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos <fitojb@ubuntu.com>
|
|
Renaming all README files for all top level modules to README.md,
applying no content change at this stage to be able to track history
of the files. These files should be edited to use correct Markdown
syntax later.
Change-Id: I542fa3f3d32072156f16eaad2211a397cc212665
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112977
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+LibreOffice@googlemail.com>
|
|
O[U]StringBuffer methods
Change-Id: I0ffbc33d54ae7c98b5652434f3370ee4f819f6f4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/110090
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Fix these kinds:
/home/pi/lo/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/uno2cpp.cxx:103:10: error:
externally available entity 'is_complex_struct' is not previously declared in an included file
(if it is only used in this translation unit, make it static; otherwise, provide a declaration of it in an included file) [loplugin:external]
bool is_complex_struct(const typelib_TypeDescription * type)
~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/pi/lo/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/uno2cpp.cxx:129:10: error:
externally available entity 'is_float_only_struct' is not previously declared in an included file
(if it is only used in this translation unit, make it static; otherwise, provide a declaration of it in an included file) [loplugin:external]
bool is_float_only_struct(const typelib_TypeDescription * type)
~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/pi/lo/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/uno2cpp.cxx:168:6: error:
externally available entity 'MapReturn' is not previously declared in an included file
(if it is only used in this translation unit, make it static; otherwise, provide a declaration of it in an included file) [loplugin:external]
void MapReturn(sal_uInt32 r0, sal_uInt32 r1, typelib_TypeDescriptionReference * pReturnType, sal_uInt32* pRegisterReturn)
/home/pi/lo/libreoffice/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm/uno2cpp.cxx:446:32: error:
static_cast from 'void **' to 'sal_Int32 *' (aka 'long *') is not allowed
sal_Int32 * pTempIndices = static_cast<sal_Int32 *>(pCppArgs + nParams);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
or some of these:
In file included from
/home/pi/lo/libreoffice/bean/native/unix/com_sun_star_comp_beans_LocalOfficeWindow.c:26:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-armhf/include/jni.h:1945:1: error: unknown
attribute 'externally_visible' ignored [-Werror,-Wunknown-attributes]
_JNI_IMPORT_OR_EXPORT_ jint JNICALL
^
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-armhf/include/jni.h:1943:32: note: expanded
from macro '_JNI_IMPORT_OR_EXPORT_'
define _JNI_IMPORT_OR_EXPORT_ JNIIMPORT
^
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-armhf/include/linux/jni_md.h:35:42: note:
expanded from macro 'JNIIMPORT'
define JNIIMPORT
__attribute__((externally_visible,visibility("default")))
Change-Id: I7cae1c52ee10306da666c9c234b9af7248efd04e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/108567
Tested-by: Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>
|
|
Change-Id: I6f2e29d2e7908a40175dc2852e955f0a1bc501e6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/108481
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Mike Kaganski <mike.kaganski@collabora.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I044dd21b63d7eb03224675584fa143009c6b6008
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/108418
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
...for LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY. These had been missed by
1b43cceaea2084a0489db68cd0113508f34b6643 "Make many OUString functions take
std::u16string_view parameters" because they did not match the multi-overload
pattern that was addressed there, but they nevertheless benefit from being
changed just as well (witness e.g. the various resulting changes from copy() to
subView()).
This showed a conversion from OStringChar to std::string_view to be missing
(while the corresponding conversion form OUStringChar to std::u16string_view was
already present).
The improvement to loplugin:stringadd became necessary to fix
> [CPT] compilerplugins/clang/test/stringadd.cxx
> error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen:
> File ~/lo/core/compilerplugins/clang/test/stringadd.cxx Line 43 (directive at ~/lo/core/compilerplugins/clang/test/stringadd.cxx:42): simplify by merging with the preceding assignment [loplugin:stringadd]
> File ~/lo/core/compilerplugins/clang/test/stringadd.cxx Line 61 (directive at ~/lo/core/compilerplugins/clang/test/stringadd.cxx:60): simplify by merging with the preceding assignment [loplugin:stringadd]
> 2 errors generated.
Change-Id: Ie40de0616a66e60e289c1af0ca60aed6f9ecc279
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/107602
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I8ba1214500dddaf413c506a4b82f43d63cda804b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/106559
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: I47b44c80b2a5e3c9d84f5d7257efe17f138a1067
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/106563
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie643402fbf10ac837c975d29068b7973e9dd6210
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/105685
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+LibreOffice@googlemail.com>
|
|
Found with bin/find-unneeded-includes
Only removal proposals are dealt with here.
Change-Id: I886b6f446293d3b1cfbf4ae05e8dbd7fabab9f20
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/105510
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
|
|
The 'javasettings_${_OS}_${_ARCH}.xml' files are only
meant to be used when the application mode of the
Java framework is used, not in direct mode.
From ure/source/README:
> You can also use the
> UNO_JAVA_JFW_JREHOME deployment variable to specify the location of a JDK/JRE
> installation. For more information on this variable, see
> http://udk.openoffice.org/common/man/spec/javavendorextension.sxw.
From that http://udk.openoffice.org/common/man/spec/javavendorextension.sxw :
> The direct mode of the framework is used within the build environment.
> Java is needed there in order to register Java UNO components with the
> regcomp tool. Direct mode means that no settings are written or read.
> That is the parameters UNO_JAVA_JFW_USER_DATA and
> UNO_JAVA_JFW_SHARED_DATA are not used.
> [...]
> Another example for using the direct mode is the SDK. The SDK uses the
> libraries from the office installation. When an SDK is configured then
> one specifies what Java is to be used. This Java shall then be used for
> all task which require Java including registration of UNO components. In
> order to override the java settings of the office the script which
> prepares the SDK environment sets these environment variables:
> UNO_JAVA_JFW_JREHOME=<file_URL_to_selected_Java>
> UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_CLASSPATH=true
> UNO_JAVA_JFW_VENDOR_SETTINGS=<file_URL_to_javavendors.xml_from_OOo>
> By setting UNO_JAVA_JFW_JREHOME the framework is switched into direct mode
> and the office settings are disregarded.
Therefore, don't try to read the settings when using direct mode.
This makes the relevant code path for accessing the settings conditional
on 'jfw::JFW_MODE_APPLICATION' being used.
Otherwise, using direct mode e.g. by starting LibreOffice using
UNO_JAVA_JFW_JREHOME=file:///usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/ ./instdir/program/soffice --writer
then going to the "Advanced" options in "Tools" -> "Options", where
the Java settings reside would result in this SAL_WARN being triggered
warn:jfw:10207:10207:jvmfwk/source/framework.cxx:119: [Java framework] Trying to access settings files in direct mode.
and no JVM at all being shown in the list of available
Java installations.
Change-Id: I2b98d822aed2b160f970c50ca695a9f3beeacd34
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/104001
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Michael Weghorn <m.weghorn@posteo.de>
|