summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/postprocess/Package_fontconfig.mk
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-05-03makefile simplification: replace $(call gb_CustomTarget_get_workdir,foo)Christian Lohmaier
…by a simple/static $(gb_CustomTarget_workdir)/foo The build system has a lot of overly complicated leftovers from when it was introduced and had not only deal with split repositories but also had to coexist with another buildsystem. Along with lots of copy'n'paste along the years the makefiles became hard to grasp for newcomers with all our calls and evals. As a first step to streamline that, the macros from TargetLocations that simply prefix a static path to the argument (and similar of the same kind) are a natural pick before simplifying the rules themselves/getting rid of a bunch of eval statements. Change-Id: Ia06dbbcd5d1994755a2ff05b84f72ccbc4e3cab5 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/167005 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+LibreOffice@googlemail.com>
2019-12-16Revert "Make font-based unit test depend on instdir fonts"Jan-Marek Glogowski
The following build: $ make clean && make gb_CppunitTest_sc_ucalc [...] $ cd sc $ make gb_CppunitTest_sc_ucalc triggers: sc/CppunitTest_sc_subsequent_filters_test.mk:133: *** Missing font filelist -> run make more_fonts extras. This didn't help the general Win32 font build problem AFAIK. There were additional patches to the way Windows loads the LO provided fonts, so just revert this. This reverts commit 368c996b24e09c427a30972b3405493328db6779. Change-Id: I841f96fe8312c47980c8e3be2e9d88242df5b28d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/84633 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
2019-07-05Make font-based unit test depend on instdir fontsJan-Marek Glogowski
The current dependency is already a hack, because there is no way I know of to depend on delivered top-level modules like more_fonts. The original patch parses the gb_Package_MODULE_ooo_fonts list of registered packages to add them as build dependencies. But this is not sufficient, as it just adds the dependencies on the installed / unpacked fonts in the workdir (actually it's just the installer filelist), where they can't be found by the unit test running in the instdir environment. So this converts the depndency into a make error, if either the filelist is missing or the included font files. But if we are in a full run and know the more_fonts module, we simply depend on its delivered files. This needs some minimal changes to gbuild, as neither the delivered file list nor the modules class names are yet available. And this moves the fontconfig handling to extras, where the opensymbol font is already handled. Change-Id: I1b70a4c45ff189266ce56c57e534ddc45e7c5c19 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/74624 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de>
2017-09-24Compensate for loss of Type 1 "Standard Symbols L" substitute for "Symbol"Stephan Bergmann
At least for me on Linux since LO 5.3, 'soffice sw/qa/extras/rtfexport/data/fdo72031.rtf' shows "Å" (rendered in "DejaVu Sans") instead of "⊕" (rendered in "Standard Symbols L"). That's presumably because 47ea13ef8dc8ab9aeded6121845e3ebd1d28b292 "Kill the old Unix layout engines" removed support for Type 1 fonts (see "Ignore Type 1 fonts" in FontCfgWrapper::addFontSet, vcl/unx/generic/fontmanager/fontconfig.cxx), and my (Fedora 25) /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/s050000l.pfb "Standard Symbols L" is a Type 1 font. So we fell back to fontconfig's generic (weak) suggestion of "DejaVu Sans" as a substitute for "Symbol". So extend our fc_local.conf to suggest our "OpenSymbol" as a substitute for "Symbol". As that fc_local.conf was originally brought along by --with-fonts, which is enabled by default but can be disabled, compilation of fc_local.conf from the various snippets is moved to postprocess. macOS and Windows were never affected, as they both come with a "Symbol" font installed in the system. (And we don't install fc_local.conf on Windows at all.) Change-Id: I8d6d87f24974577fd66f5f3989f606237ebb3d75 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/42670 Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>