Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: Iecd6b5e13d6be14651f77d8e37f01117ba15a11e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/26883
Reviewed-by: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>
Tested-by: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic3efae53430fbb2c1eb7962c3cf69bf99315e55b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/26202
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I95041f49dd22ba9a15da3598b04a010eecf761a8
|
|
so that we get nice stack traces in our test error logs instead of just
the title of the exception
Change-Id: I47f30d80b9efbc7dbeff7f4456755e416e577b5a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/25510
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I860cc4aa04b4e5cd1437b2f24176ee2ccdec3266
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/25420
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
and lets see if anyone complains
Change-Id: I0ec236006476064e67cda9869ab45c1860ed351b
|
|
found by UCDetector
Change-Id: Ic0295a24b26e206eb53eda2da540755477df86df
|
|
Change-Id: I1d51b96042f229de42ed26d90ecc2a070eb5b3a6
|
|
It's unclear to me why the disposeOffice method was marked "synchronized" in the
first place with fbd72be142ed23b3b526c8d0c3e002f15ca7ec74 "INTEGRATION: CWS
qadev16: #114831#." Maybe just some cluelessness? Lets see whether we ever run
into any problems after removing it.
Change-Id: I1f262b6b4b4f4e8911754a6b3fa3d61f5df0aeae
|
|
Change-Id: I40f73b48757e81ac4e1b5374bef4fea334ca8d0a
|
|
Change-Id: I4586168d3af81f047a4ded59fc6d257f17554885
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/22194
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>
Tested-by: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>
|
|
and
coverity#1351881 Resource leak
Change-Id: Ifdbff9d164f3b8b2ce5f59b6e18e6744202d0184
|
|
Change-Id: I1e7605b20716a48bc7a65e76f43fa0061e0d8176
|
|
Change-Id: Ifedb32769551949fdda7d203812b803353a3f487
|
|
Change-Id: Ie9336625f9f5733f9da96b8e7f1aa95228922a8a
|
|
Change-Id: I1c65e776580b03a658c61c3c680f63d5c35fa52a
|
|
Change-Id: Id1c35c5022eddfd1d7bca88c4833a0cba01b9cfa
|
|
Change-Id: I08955a20e0566f56701bef85a4a9d4de79ca7b1f
|
|
Change-Id: I520235178bc1eaea5e5bc0497ab8824bf2775456
|
|
null pointer dereference, made test
Change-Id: I2bd820a2eb04499ab3b518d5b5e5ccccf3ffe531
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/21771
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>
|
|
null pointer dereferencing, added null check
Change-Id: I78f3ee1eb5d5bd4ebe7b3a6775db4884859dbcf6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/21712
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: jan iversen <jani@documentfoundation.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifad565e1548a9564196bfcd7b77d81ebb97231f6
|
|
Change-Id: I150d3df8926a547b8ecf4324303dc4520ee2e899
|
|
Change-Id: If2491fb126f7392ed641087322a863736e7f4342
|
|
Change-Id: I9a5940027423ff0791fa7da0b79b617412ce6b86
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/21209
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashod Nakashian <ashnakash@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic1130017c02a470ebd213704ad5c56b6747dfee0
|
|
Change-Id: I3c00520c0337f8d282c0c63f08a3de43bf52b2d9
|
|
Change-Id: Ib92a893fc5c3cc89ce78733b95406d5ec415cb26
|
|
Change-Id: I1e87d33d12b246aa071d28af3eec69bf79c7bf6f
|
|
Change-Id: Iddf881369ff8a177fba9ebe9a673291a9b8ed431
|
|
Change-Id: I91ae690e26a05dbe4424b7f2ac3bd9ad029ebf5c
|
|
Change-Id: I4bcde379701e8f3542f8e54e59b529466213d72e
|
|
Change-Id: Ia8cff25ac8eb9539b81bdebe2aa52c324d70b357
|
|
and
coverity#1326954 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326955 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326956 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326957 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326958 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326959 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326960 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326961 RV: Bad use of return value
coverity#1326962 RV: Bad use of return value
Change-Id: I02c2f7a5214e348f06a12b78a9400d8501b00e57
|
|
and
coverity#1326611 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326612 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326613 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326614 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326615 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326617 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326618 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326619 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326620 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326621 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326622 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326623 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326624 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326625 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326626 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
coverity#1326627 DE: Dropped or ignored exception
Change-Id: I921a5434a6a116db5033cb2c90a59008c13f1bb2
|
|
Change-Id: I3889453be48aaffc8015fbbb5672d34e904c3770
|
|
...instead of being removed, a9824e8e05bddbf8ec417c7e5447914dd22cb8e5
"cid#1326591, cid#1326590 useless call"
Change-Id: Ia71abff8fb821cb4904794e1f9cbeb320e17c629
|
|
The call does not do anything, removed.
Change-Id: I24e37ec47551f7dc47a4be6f717f95800624500f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/20392
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9aff17d367ba48609067abdb2a5fb5111daee38c
|
|
Change-Id: I4f51d49a18adf76a741d55d67ed3ba2a7a2cc439
|
|
and
coverity#1326179 Dereference after null check
Change-Id: I65099a52d8b275655c2de29848f364de0be06161
|
|
Change-Id: I39fbe3a260c8dbfc203662c54eec4db064b88195
|
|
Change-Id: I0457b81668e9427a3c8d6a4af93438b7fb2bb7ba
|
|
the compiler will do it for you
Change-Id: I770670e70a43664a87ce28b48fc822d891d8fb41
|
|
Change-Id: I3f9742cafdcdce3302c925a2227da1f7839c80c3
|
|
FindBugs' FE.FE_FLOATING_POINT_EQUALITY is about double value inaccuracies, not
about NaN or negative zero (which is the topic of java.lang.Double.equals vs.
==).
Reuse existing qa.TestCaseOldAPI.approxEqual method, moved to util.utils.
Change-Id: I65f7bb1faf921e1c4035bb96aeff1eaf2cfb3153
|
|
Change-Id: Ia266e5c1b66e35fdb4c6fdd5816f3b35d54ae1bd
|
|
...same as 8fb3808f555ad5b5c66cb894f9402647ca9ba341
Change-Id: If21d6bbf5f88b8ca5ed5387d98b2dd9c74f0e32c
|
|
...as null values are handled just fine by compare()
Change-Id: Ifd17b96187ad3d13be99b107d3c3fa47e51b586e
|
|
When the property type is e.g. a UNO sequence or struct type, !equals would
trivially be always true (as the UNO bridge creates fresh instances of such
value types on the fly), masking failures where the tested code didn't change
the property value at all.
And one such masked failure was
sw.CharacterStyle::com::sun::star::style::CharacterProperties in
JunitTest_sw_unoapi_1 not changing any of the CharLeft/Right/Bottom/TopBorder
properties, as SvxBorderLine::GuessLinesWidths
(editeng/source/items/borderline.cxx) appears to only work properly if nStyle is
DOUBLE, so work around that for now by explicitly setting that BorderLineStyle
in the ValueChanger for BorderLine2.
Change-Id: If9536822c5db04cbd01e6d760b5b63da04c4cf5b
|