Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Found with bin/find-unneeded-includes
Only removal proposals are dealt with here.
Change-Id: I819bb44e36bdb6ec671cf11bd779085767d82fd0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/67697
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
|
|
...after 7ffdd830d5fb52f2ca25aa80277d22ea6d89970b
"HAVE_CPP_ATTRIBUTE_FALLTHROUGH is always true now"
Change-Id: I54e5ff4e036a6bb3e5774d1c0524158aae18e937
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/64800
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I499856ba451c71bb53e99d74c5a89f1a185c9386
|
|
Change-Id: I9a897af88aa9f6f7ca98ce521c69b5a4ee8462e9
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/31903
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
Tested-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
...which (in LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY) for Clang expands to [[clang::fallthrough]] in
preparation of enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. (This is only relevant for
C++11, as neither C nor old C++ has a way to annotate intended fallthroughs.)
Could use BOOST_FALLTHROUGH instead of introducing our own SAL_FALLTHROUGH, but
that would require adding back in dependencies on boost_headers to many
libraries where we carefully removed any remaining Boost dependencies only
recently. (At least make SAL_FALLTHROUGH strictly LIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY, so its
future evolution will not have any impact on the stable URE interface.) C++17
will have a proper [[fallthroug]], eventually removing the need for a macro
altogether.
Change-Id: I342a7610a107db7d7a344ea9cbddfd9714d7e9ca
|
|
Change-Id: Ie5a37a49f1b1c08a20f89e167ca415fc645ed40d
|
|
found with
$ git grep -lP 'return\s*\(\s*\w+\s*\)\s*;'
Change-Id: Ic51606877a9edcadeb647c5bf17bc928b69ab60e
|
|
Change-Id: I564ef5ebf16c0ee50da69f3d8b97a5452a1cd0b8
|
|
Change-Id: I6c145e984c885c7e06caa1c27bfb354ea49ad9ce
|
|
|
|
|