Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
It appears that the C++ standard allows overriding destructors to be marked
"override," but at least some MSVC versions complain about it, so at least make
sure such destructors are explicitly marked "virtual."
Change-Id: I0e1cafa7584fd16ebdce61f569eae2373a71b0a1
|
|
...mostly done with a rewriting Clang plugin, with just some manual tweaking
necessary to fix poor macro usage.
Change-Id: Ie656f9d653fc716f72ac175925272696d509038f
|
|
...where the latter contains SAL_OVERRIDE annotations
Change-Id: Id64794b388d83dfe7026440e8b20a5b5efd412d1
|
|
...and SfxEnumItemInterface::HasBoolValue, too.
Change-Id: Ia032e3d35a4c3b4c1efdc515ca36e466be03fc0a
|
|
Change-Id: Ifc9837e9f6e3c6a84e9f01c192f10271b184fb6d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/5720
Reviewed-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
Tested-by: Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
|
|
Change-Id: I390413e9ff3efee720a6423fb8695b4c655d7efa
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/4280
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Tested-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
|
|
|
|
Modules sal, salhelper, cppu, cppuhelper, codemaker (selectively) and odk
have kept them, in order not to break external API (the automatic using declaration
is LO-internal).
Change-Id: I588fc9e0c45b914f824f91c0376980621d730f09
|
|
|