Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This moves the classes from juh.jar and ridl.jar to libreoffice.jar
The goal is to have one single jar (and Java module, will be added later)
which developers can include to work with LO.
juh.jar and ridl.jar are kept as basically empty jars with libreoffice.jar
on its classpath to keep backwards compatibility.
This is a continuation of ae855bf48163ff64d94cfc34aff8e37abdb5518d
and a preparation to have Java 9 module support.
Change-Id: Ifbbfb97f60373d14256e62ae3122913bd17d5bbb
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/91930
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
jurt.jar and unoil.jar are kept as effectively empty jars, each with a
Class-Path: ridl.jar
in their meta-inf/manifest.mf, so that 3rd-party code loading them (with or
without also loading ridl.jar) will still have access to their content.
Conceptually, the UNOIDL entities in unoil.jar (corresponding to module offapi)
are not part of the URE, but are now made available by URE's ridl.jar. This
should probably not cause problems in practice.
At least for now, we seal exactly those packages in ridl.jar that were
originally sealed in jurt.jar. Ideally, all of ridl.jar could be sealed now,
but that would be mildly incompatible, as it would prevent 3rd-party code from
introducing additional UNOIDL entities in the relevant namespaces (even if that
is something we do not want 3rd-party code to do anyway).
However, some JunitTest_jurt_* define classes in those sealed packages. In the
past they got away with that by using gb_JunitTest_use_jar_classset,*,jurt.
Instead they now need to gb_JunitTest_use_jar_classset,*,ridl and drop the
gb_JunitTest_use_jar,*,ridl. But the former only makes available the classes
that are specified in ridljar/Jar_ridl.mk with gb_Jar_add_sourcefiles, not the
UNOIDL entities specified via gb_Jar_add_packagedirs. But the tests need the
udkapi UNOIDL entities, so introduce gb_JunitTest_add_classpath to let the tests
get them explicitly. (Curiously, JunitTest_jurt_uno and JnitTest_jurt_util use
gb_JunitTest_use_jar_classset,*,jurt but don't seem to acutally need it; lets
leave that for a follow-up clean up.)
As a follow-up clean up, relevant files could be moved from jurt/ to ridljar/.
Change-Id: I836f4e7bb47fb41f1306e3f223da90dba988eb9a
Co-authored-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/84946
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9cc9bfbddd3a90e00eee3e674994e5d6207f9034
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: I9f49970e5e06d1afd3fc066a20d1671c93e262fc
|
|
Naming convention for gbuild methods:
- "add" is used for stuff that is logically a part of the target
(i.e. not registered at the Module, but defined in the target's makefile)
- "use" is used for stuff that is logically a different target
(i.e. it is registered at the Module, has it's own makefile, may be
in a different module than the target)
|
|
...they contained no class files anymore, due to missing gb_Jar_set_packageroot
calls. However, those calls only work for subdirectories, i.e., the example
.java files need to be put into a package (I chose
org.libreoffice.example.java_scripts) for all of them). This in turn required
adaption of the parcel-descriptor.xml files; not sure what the logicalname
entries there are good for if anything -- the macro names at "Tools - Macros -
Run Macro..." now unfortunately(?) contain the fully qualified paths for the
HelloWorld, HighlightText, and MemoryUpdate examples. There are additional
examples at scripting/examples/java/ that apparently do not get packaged (but I
adapted them anyway).
|
|
|
|
|