summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sw/inc/IDocumentMarkAccess.hxx
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-02-11sw: rename getFieldmarkFor() to getInnerFieldmarkFor()Justin Luth
The same change was made for getBookmarkFor() in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145412 Because otherwise it's quite confusing that we have a For() and an At() which could only be differentiated by a code read. Also improve getInnerFieldmarkFor() a tiny bit, so we process the first hit only once. Suggested at <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145348/1#message-286262286f234823b390e8f962e3ba11f5fa71b2>. Change-Id: I47e815eea0b8ac0df4957ac0d224acb6c5975b8e Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145486 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com>
2023-01-31tdf#143148 sw: inc: Use pragma once instead of include guardsRasenkai
Change-Id: I7a491038d1b8532385e70294872d209dcdc63ce9 Signed-off-by: Rasenkai <rasenkai99@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/146300 Tested-by: Jenkins Tested-by: Ilmari Lauhakangas <ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org> Reviewed-by: Ilmari Lauhakangas <ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoffice.org>
2023-01-30tdf#151548 sw content controls: keyboard navigation with tab keyJustin Luth
Combine content controls with legacy formfield controls in keyboard tab navigation. MS Word (I tested 2010) is extremely irrational and inconsistent in its behaviour, so I modeled my implementation on the specification and general logic, and not at all on "compatible misbehaviour". There is a third category of form control (activeX rich content), but these are mapped to internal LO controls that are only exposed at VCL level, and don't pass the keystrokes back to SW. Plus, they are not inline, but fly controls. However, it is still a TODO to handle these if reasonably possible. Change-Id: I1fef34d05a779e9d4f549987238435acb6c043d2 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/146219 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com> Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
2023-01-24related tdf#151548 formfield navigation: loop to beginning/endJustin Luth
When reaching the end of the form using keyboard navigation, the next tabstop should return the user to the beginning of the form. This patch adds that to the existing legacy formfield navigation. I'll wait with a unit test until I have added activeX/contentControls into the mix. Change-Id: I24a15a60f5a0a2721f512cca50397efddcbf7e4b Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/146035 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com>
2023-01-18sw: rename getBookmarkFor() further to getOneInnermostBookmarkFor()Miklos Vajna
One additional complexity I missed is that there can be only one innermost fieldmark for a position, but there can be multiple bookmarks, because bookmarks don't have a starting dummy character. See <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145412/2#message-85a4780c8140038a9cc2bd4b9af64ecf97ee5e60>. Change-Id: Ia5d3bebddd42be7c44b8df2d5db3c5312285a5f5 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145699 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
2023-01-13sw: rename getBookmarkFor() to getInnerBookmarkFor()Miklos Vajna
Because otherwise it's quite confusing that we have a For() and an At() variant as well, and it would be less clear what happens in For() when there are multiple matches. Also improve getInnerBookmarkFor() a tiny little, so we process the first hit only once. Suggested at <https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145348/1#message-286262286f234823b390e8f962e3ba11f5fa71b2>. Change-Id: If068f93e6934c9fc042760c03aac866fe5b50bd2 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145412 Reviewed-by: Justin Luth <jluth@mail.com> Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
2023-01-11sw lok: expose name of bookmark under cursorMiklos Vajna
It was possible to get the names of all bookmarks, but you could not get the name of the (innermost) bookmark under the current cursor. Getting the name of the current bookmark is useful for Zotero: if we already have a citation and want to insert one more, then we should turn the current citation into a citation cluster. Fix the problem by adding an API similar to what commit bb20dee2ef1b0804065e1cda2c834d257fdd90ed (sw lok: expose field type & command of fieldmark under cursor, 2023-01-05) did, but here we deal with bookmarks, not fieldmarks. Handle the actual bookmark lookup in MarkManager, such functionality looks useful outside LOK as well. Change-Id: Ic5b9b36fda243c5d7d360fa03745b3e121b67b06 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/145323 Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com> Tested-by: Jenkins
2022-08-25use SwNode instead of SwNodeIndex in CorrAbs/CorrRelNoel Grandin
part of the process of hiding the internals of SwPosition Change-Id: Id00dc63fd30ea9cf015b9d5f69ee8eb82dc52228 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/138834 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2022-08-23sw: enable Replace with Protect BookmarksMichael Stahl
The dialog calls Replace on the whole bookmark, and with commit 7974cea6c788e02d7c36573e2d10dcc51884f70e the bookmark is preserved, so the HasReadonlySel() should not prevent this replace from happening. Change-Id: I823b042c8327c6716b2ac1a8a86beffd887e6e4c Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/138693 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
2022-08-15pass SwNode and sal_Int32 to deleteMarksNoel Grandin
instead of SwNodeIndex and SwContentIndex. Part of the process of hiding the implementation of SwPosition. Change-Id: I290fbc14d738d1bbf5d3f613eae6d114fc7cda17 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/138271 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2022-07-25rename SwIndex->SwContentIndexNoel Grandin
to help my poor brain with the different kinds of index we have floating around Change-Id: I47ed223922170687d7e07812445aed66b3218230 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/137404 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2022-04-05forcepoint#104 sw: do not delete fieldmark chars in MoveNodeRange()Caolán McNamara
The problem is that SwXTextTableCursor::mergeRange() wants to move some nodes, and the deleteMarks() deletes a fieldmark creating a SaveBookmark but it contains the positions relative to the CH_TXT_ATR_FIELD* still in the text, while deleting the fieldmark of course removes these. The SaveBookmark would need to adjust the indexes and store the separator position too and the vector would need to be restored in reverse order. But every time the SaveBookmarks are created, they are restored as well, so it looks simpler to just suppress deleting the CH_TXT_ATR_FIELD* in this case, and inserting them too (latter is already done when copying text). Change-Id: I690c6432a38eab6dec10adff74e638f0e52cca55 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/132531 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
2022-03-14loplugin:trivialdestructor (-stdlib=libc++)Stephan Bergmann
That these are only flagged when building against libc++ and not against libstdc++ is a consequence of the plugin's dependence on implementation details of the relevant classes, but so be it. Change-Id: I6b96f81939edab2b8e618aa53c9fe23492edfbbd Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131562 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
2022-01-19sw: generalize ModelToViewHelper to handle all NonTextFieldmarksMichael Stahl
Rename getDropDownsFor() to getNoTextFieldmarksIn(). Move some code so that sw::mark::ExpandFieldmark can expand all fieldmarks that use CH_TXT_ATR_FORMELEMENT. Change-Id: I8a1e28fc0ad77df3a749d9e55c306cb45187a082 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/128606 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@allotropia.de>
2021-05-31no need to allocate this separatelyNoel Grandin
Change-Id: Ia6ed82b67a412841e1559f385afec17da3852d7d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/116399 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2021-03-18tdf#140980 sw: fix bad strikethrough of annotationsLászló Németh
Not deleted annotation windows got a bad strikethrough in ChangesInMargin mode, if they annotate tracked deletions. Also clean-up commit a001a66ba27e2fe9a485388869d53f001f2b09af (tdf#140982 sw ChangesInMargin: fix annotation ranges). Change-Id: I06cb88113bf038c09702b6ef33e46c94c963730d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112672 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org>
2021-03-17tdf#140982 sw ChangesInMargin: fix annotation rangesLászló Németh
Annotation ranges of tracked deletions collapsed in ChangesInMargin mode (as before saving the document, see commit d325cd0c69b7c0cc4f47105749a98995de81cc9d "tdf#115815 sw: fix lost annotation ranges of redlines"). Change-Id: I413804cfcdf972f054b65e28e6265c30d25731e3 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112644 Tested-by: László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org> Reviewed-by: László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org>
2021-02-25tdf#115815 sw: fix lost annotation ranges of redlinesLászló Németh
Annotations of tracked deletions lost their ranges during ODF export, according to the limitation of ODF or its recent implementation. As a workaround, save and restore the start of the annotation ranges using temporary bookmarks (which can be part of text:deletion). Note: maybe it's possible to split redline ranges regarding to the start of the annotation ranges, mixing tracked deletions with normal text or tracked insertions, but this would be a not backward compatible solution, because the ODF import of this file inserts extra (not tracked) spaces around the annotation, losing the original text content. Change-Id: I786993a05ee1683076e213374a92969d1856cf8c Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/111489 Tested-by: László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org> Reviewed-by: László Németh <nemeth@numbertext.org>
2020-11-02sw: return SwXFieldmark in SwXFieldEnumerationMichael Stahl
* Implement text::XTextField in SwXFieldmark * That requires overriding XTextContent, just forward to SwXBookmark * Also override XServiceInfo implementation in SwXFieldmark * Add a PropertySetInfo for SwXFieldmark, which doesn't support "Hidden" or "Condition" properties of SwXBookmark * in SwXFieldmark::setFieldType(), only allow sensible new types * fix DomainMapper_Impl assumptions that if it implements XTextField it can't be a fieldmark, which caused CppunitTest_sw_ooxmlexport10 testTdf92157 to fail with a SAXException caused by some disposed SwXTextCursor Change-Id: I1ae2e9cb99ea784040874517e4d1af7e59d24405 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/105083 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@cib.de>
2020-05-09compact namespace in swNoel Grandin
Change-Id: Ie2c3e3f95a687b12b89bcfc5cad44fb7a1d4568f Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/93862 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2020-02-03sw: implement protection of bookmarks and fieldsMichael Stahl
SwPaM::HasReadonlySel() checks PROTECT_BOOKMARKS / PROTECT_FIELDS setting and checks if bookmarks or fields are selected for deletion. This should already be called by the UI code in all the right places, for the other content protection features, and cause a dialog to pop up. What's not ideal about this is that it's impossible to delete a character immediately before or after a point bookmark because that would delete the point bookmark too. The bookmark check is done by extracting a function out of MarkManager::deleteMarks() so both will use the same logic. The problem of DelContentIndex() duplicating that logic remains... Apparently the status bar at the bottom already displays "read-only" for such a selection. Change-Id: Id87999198a03ba847ef0eff5651fef3bd2517fae Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/87778 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@cib.de>
2019-10-23sw: SwWrtShell: delete field command when deleting the fieldMichael Stahl
Change-Id: I6dbb7a36bdca103d6e9e72a5b5b48ffc135080a1 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/80676 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@cib.de>
2019-10-23sw: add CH_TXT_ATR_FIELDSEP position parameter when insertingMichael Stahl
Different callers want it at the end, at the start, or in the case of Undo it can even be in an arbitrary position... (except if it is ensured that the field command is deleted before the fieldmark?). So let's just pass in SwPosition and be flexible, if it is missing it will be before the end as before. Change-Id: Ibec222f633bdaf66abd1540027d0f5c75988c738 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/80673 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@cib.de>
2019-10-04sw: add IDocumentMarkAccess::getFieldmarkAt()Michael Stahl
... and use it where the mark for a given CH_TXT_ATR_FIELD* is retrieved. Change-Id: Id58ac2967ab66be8a07586ef31cfe9e18a5f073d Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/80050 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <michael.stahl@cib.de>
2019-08-30new loplugin:noexceptmoveNoel Grandin
idea from mike kaganski look for places where we can mark move operators as noexcept, which makes some STL operations more efficient Change-Id: Id732b89d1fcadd5ceb0ea2b9d159fed06136330f Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/78251 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2019-07-17loplugin:unusedmethodsNoel Grandin
Change-Id: Ie2285f64919d1c83b0a8df4ceb827f731e5cd609 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/75739 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2019-07-12MSForms: Rework text-based date form field's representationTamás Zolnai
* Better to represent it similar to text form field with two marking characters selecting a text range * So the text between the two marks can be anything (not only a well formatted date) and also have any character formatting. * With this we handle the case when the user needs a placeholder text in the date field or when the user needs time values (hour, minute, sec) next to the date. Change-Id: Id60a50a2028058f8a6a080e265c0730d88b98543 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/75459 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Tamás Zolnai <tamas.zolnai@collabora.com>
2019-07-12MSForms: Introduce a new fieldmark class for text-based date fieldTamás Zolnai
Change-Id: I3df49c516603fb16601fc0a9c13c6d9ea401207a Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/75437 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Tamás Zolnai <tamas.zolnai@collabora.com>
2019-07-03Fix typoAndrea Gelmini
Change-Id: I9f92c0d2bc058e65574ffc5cc0e9a61764f86db5 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/75051 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>
2019-07-03sw: remove dynamic_cast to MarkBase in MarkManagerMichael Stahl
Forward port of https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/74851/ and much smaller because the shared_ptr has been removed in commit 9ff648c691f003a11eba9a22ac37032d72b4b642 The MarkManager always has MarkBase instances in its vectors, so abstract the vector better in the IDocumentMarkAccess interface by exposing only a wrapper iterator that converts from MarkBase to IMark. There is an unexpected pitfall here in that forward iterator's operator* is required to return a reference, but at least for a const_iterator it appears to work to just return a value instead. The dynamic_cast of every element in some MarkManager functions is quite expensive and shows as 10-15% in callgrind. In bubli's measurements, in the 6.1 branch this speeds up loading the bugdoc by ~40s of the initial 3min 50s. Change-Id: I65d974bea0301bf7b4cfa25ad6daae10b6768202 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/75033 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <Michael.Stahl@cib.de>
2019-05-31tdf#125372 writer, file with lots of hints very slow to open, part8Noel Grandin
Takes load time from 22s to 15.5s sw::mark::IMark does not need to be held by shared_ptr - we have one vector, which holds all marks we created, and when we remove from that vector, which remove the other references too. Change-Id: Ie6d287d9d825f7129855b64a34afa81a2ef9c378 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/73206 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2019-05-26move some searching inside IDocumentMarkAccessNoel Grandin
to make followup improvements easier Change-Id: I2b0ab30589bc19a3e6c80228ab037745c7781292 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/72978 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
2019-03-09MSForms: Add a drop-down button for drop-down form fieldTamás Zolnai
* Introduce a editing frame with a button for drop-down form field. ** The frame is mouse transparent. ** Pushing the button opens the popup window with the items of the field. * The button is visible when the cursor is inside the field. Change-Id: I5c7db138d14380899fee046c95a5afe14cfea213 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/68961 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Tamás Zolnai <tamas.zolnai@collabora.com>
2019-03-09MSForms: Introduce a new IFieldMark for drop-down form fieldTamás Zolnai
* It was weird anyway that a drop-down form field was represented as an CheckboxFieldmark. * It will be useful for later commits, to have a separate field type for drop-down field. * Needed to fix-up the API a bit because it was designed to specify the field type after initialization. I solved it in a way to not break the API behavior. Hopefully it's not very slow. Change-Id: I3103e6b1c36289b27b62ab9ca7dfeebc14901c8a Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/68960 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Tamás Zolnai <tamas.zolnai@collabora.com>
2019-03-09MSForms: Implement undo / redo for insertion of legacy form fieldsTamás Zolnai
Need to handle undo / redo explicitely for form fields, because there is no a general working undo / redo mechanism for fieldmarks. During the insertion of the fieldmark, text insertion also happens which generates an interfering undo action, so we need to disable undoing temporary. Also need to invalidta SID_UNDO slot to make the undo toolbar item updated after we insert a form field. Change-Id: I358c2704cb30212a38f8a998888a36f72fa404e5 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/68956 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Tamás Zolnai <tamas.zolnai@collabora.com>
2017-10-23loplugin:includeform: swStephan Bergmann
Change-Id: Ifc3c4c31a31ee7189eeab6f1af30b94d64f2f92a
2017-09-27tdf#112679 sw: fix copying of fieldmarksMichael Stahl
Aha, now we know that the reason for the defensive programming in lcl_AssureFieldMarksSet() was that there are actually 2 different use-cases for it: usually a new mark is inserted, so there are no dummy characters and they must be inserted. However when copying text, the dummy characters are copied too, so they must not be inserted, or we get duplicate fieldmarks. This also reverts commit d4036d3a89b65a4912f62e3930eb1a31cd90a16b which fixed the problem only for CHECKBOX_FIELDMARK in a different way. (regression from bb069fe7b8b6a24f9ff4df4c7052961e17ea3a8c) Change-Id: I3c99b8c6d720951655198e682018794337859373
2016-06-16Remove the :: prefix in ::std for swMark Page
This patch was created using a script Variable name textual alignment is preserved to the same level Change-Id: I6b4858f8059b8cf71fc253e87d6df634362d62e9 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/26306 Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org> Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
2016-01-08tdf#96480: ODF import: eliminate duplicate cross reference heading bookmarksMichael Stahl
7c3c3006deaaaf1bb3f2f4eeeaf11da3bcebe53c is apparently worse than it appeared at first glance since there are numerous assumptions about bookmarks, such as that if they were inserted successfully they may be copied successfully, which isn't the case for duplicate cross reference bookmarks. So fix this differently, by eliminating the duplicates and mapping all reference fields to refer to the surviving bookmark. It was not possible to do this in SwXBookmark by checking the makeMark() return as that would raise interesting problems such as it's currently guaranteed to have 1:1 SwXBoomarks to core Marks so we can't just connect 2 SwXBookmarks to the same core Mark, and we also can't leave the SwXBookmark unconnected after attach. Another alternative would be to temporarily allow inserting the duplicate bookmarks and then eliminate them after the import, but what is implemented now is to check from xmloff for duplicates, which is reasonably simple. Change-Id: I7ee4854d1c9d8bf74201089cbb7287b1bd8ee3b9
2015-10-13tdf#94804 sw: allow duplicate heading cross reference bookmarksMichael Stahl
... in ODF import, so that reference fields do not break that reference numbering cross reference bookmarks that were corrupted by commit 679faffc68bb854af0f55d0f218698e2f372f00b. This used to work by accident before commit 9d0c51daea67104349cac26de9839afa8baeb099 fixed it to actually check for duplicates properly. Change-Id: I5ed58eda7f3f2ce470a778852f6dda7a14356860
2015-09-17boost->stdCaolán McNamara
Change-Id: Idfbcfa1e5ba7bff92e98693c33c4b33a6beda08f
2015-05-20bin/rename-sw-abbreviations.shlibreoffice-5-0-branch-pointChristian Lohmaier
renames the most annoying abbreviations in Writer (and partially in the shared code too). Change-Id: I9a62759138126c1537cc5c985ba05cf54d6132d9
2015-03-11convert MarkType to enum classNoel Grandin
Change-Id: I73c23d327104b377834013a0a6bd2de18de2900b
2015-03-05V801: Decreased performanceCaolán McNamara
Change-Id: I5e7b5327b542f610efb0960b8bcfad10e04025b5
2015-01-22::rtl::OUString->OUStringCaolán McNamara
Change-Id: I68654a5fa4cbb7403c00b103e2be5929ccb516a2
2014-09-19SwCursor::SelectWordWT: include comment anchor character of a commented wordMiklos Vajna
In case the user double-clicks on a word and exactly that word is commented, then we used to select only the word, but not its comment anchor character. So when the user deleted the selection, the comment left there. It is still possible to manually select only the word, but on double-click let's just select the comment anchor as well, so a simple double-click on the commented word will remove the comment as well. Change-Id: I7322af61c31e8aba108eef5596849d17d55fc7eb
2014-08-23fdo#82577: Handle KeyCodeTor Lillqvist
Put the VCL KeyCode class in the vcl namespace. Avoids clash with the X11 KeyCode typedef. Change-Id: I624c9d937f7c5f5986d313b6c5f060bd8bb7e028
2014-07-09Related: #i125215# MarkManager: remove unnecessary mark containerOliver-Rainer Wittmann
(cherry picked from commit f73412f09ca8a34bb7ec73370dae3e6033c0c581) Conflicts: sw/inc/IDocumentMarkAccess.hxx sw/source/core/doc/docbm.cxx sw/source/core/doc/docdde.cxx sw/source/core/inc/MarkManager.hxx Change-Id: I8aa3a0a3362de63fec9cd640ffde89d5f7f57417
2014-06-08these symbols belong to libswloDavid Tardon
Change-Id: I04b970a58b5d138b89f4eb331b3f53ebcb55236a
2014-03-28Related: fdo#73936 for spelling restrict formelements-as-fields..Caolán McNamara
to dropdowns to be on the safe side for now anyway. Change-Id: I88a73fe37b39306c6b24226e3b02c702d992ecb0
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-01-12 04:29:19 +0000