| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
... move it into cpputools and rename ure/Package_install.mk to
ure/Package_ure_install.mk, to match the module name.
Follow up from commit 92a90cf5ccb998d2fcc77a62bb971534e410cdec
("Don't build the static uno binary"). I missed that hunk in a
larger patch, because the script was in a different module, then
the binary.
Change-Id: If7f3152be9567cf84be176d3fedefbcd5ad8d387
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/128138
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Jan-Marek Glogowski <glogow@fbihome.de>
|
|
So no need to expand it at configure time in ure/source/unorc, and no need to
handle the related builddir!=srcdir complications.
Change-Id: Ifa34d25fab9ad2da13ed039bf6c5921b0fb58703
|
|
The problem is that the ure/source/unorc file is now expanded by the configure
script, and thus exists only in builddir. But a further complication is that
the uno.ini file is in srcdir. This is one way to handle it. Seems to work for
me, let's see what the srcdir!=builddir tinderbox slaves say.
Change-Id: I6fb456cf849ce5077e2c5bd25dc9149096aab241
|
|
This commit adds gb_Package_add_symbolic_link.
Change-Id: I58511ede3da402464e60a4c45549c15c9c5dd1a5
|
|
Change-Id: Ia4cc2b8e504f46734ea7bfaade60bf27509cce32
|
|
|
|
If anyone wants to do anything with it, there are the sources (but quick
look at ure/source/uretest/Makefile suggests it is dmake, so good luck
with that .-) Maybe it is just another relic of the past that can be
removed?
Change-Id: I44b4a36d89a5617d5dba9e063e8b8b19c1dba240
|
|
Change-Id: I54d8923ad315e8041fd3904da3a29f1a7a8c8b16
|
|
|
