| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I8c33291dae8a4f90c02f47d823b127ca4e383d61
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123338
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: I18e663a6da34ef34630272819420ead6f3b8389d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/116087
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib574403a7f7f8b11c6263c9c19ec6b65c8374ddd
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/115753
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Issue the "instead of O[U]String, pass [u16]string_view" diagnostic also for
operator call arguments. (The "rather than copy, pass subView()" diagnostic is
already part of handleSubExprThatCouldBeView, so no need to repeat it explicitly
for operator call arguments.)
(And many call sites don't even require an explicit [u16]string_view, esp. with
the recent ad48b2b02f83eed41fb1eb8d16de7e804156fcf1 "Optimized OString operator
+= overloads". Just some test code in sal/qa/ that explicitly tests the
O[U]String functionality had to be excluded.)
Change-Id: I8d55ba5a7fa16a563f5ffe43d245125c88c793bc
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/115589
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
entire module was not covered by unittests and there was no way
to test some of the latest fixes done there, like f4a5893ece.
Now it is possible and a test for
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/104619 was added
Removed remains of older unused tests.
Change-Id: Ide7bc3704efa1bb4bc62ed71bf4dd8b1ad4e800f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112569
Tested-by: Thorsten Behrens <thorsten.behrens@allotropia.de>
Reviewed-by: Thorsten Behrens <thorsten.behrens@allotropia.de>
|
