From cbac061416e5142fcce9d92b1e58d9679dd9c879 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tor Lillqvist <tml@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:38:26 +0200
Subject: Use a more descriptive name for the Impress Remote Control Bluetooth
 service

No point in using a generic "Serial Port" name, or describe it as a "COM Port"
(eek). The remote control app doesn't check what the service name is
anyway. (It probably should?)

Change-Id: I6098110e8c4f62e20c38cf7e6b2071f00dd00515
---
 sd/source/ui/remotecontrol/BluetoothServiceRecord.hxx | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sd/source/ui/remotecontrol/BluetoothServiceRecord.hxx b/sd/source/ui/remotecontrol/BluetoothServiceRecord.hxx
index 4c397677eb0b..690d7fd43a03 100644
--- a/sd/source/ui/remotecontrol/BluetoothServiceRecord.hxx
+++ b/sd/source/ui/remotecontrol/BluetoothServiceRecord.hxx
@@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ static const char *bluetooth_service_record =
       // Attribute identifiers are pointed to by the Language Base Attribute ID List
       //  id+0 = ServiceName, id+1 = ServiceDescription, id+2=ProviderName
       "<attribute id=\"0x0100\">"
-        "<text value=\"Serial Port\"/>"
+        "<text value=\"LibreOffice Impress Remote Control\"/>"
       "</attribute>"
-      "<attribute id=\"0x0101\">"
-        "<text value=\"COM Port\"/>"
+      "<attribute id=\"0x0102\">"
+        "<text value=\"The Document Foundation\"/>"
       "</attribute>"
     "</record>"
   ;
-- 
cgit