From 7c8c4f783101a427da5e1f44eede054595a72605 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tor Lillqvist Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 00:20:38 +0200 Subject: Add comment about SOLAR_JAVA's alleged "BUILD" value --- configure.in | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'configure.in') diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index 2f8cf7ff03d4..3977d7f57bc5 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -3875,7 +3875,12 @@ AC_SUBST(SOLAR_JAVA) dnl SOLAR_JAVA="YES" (yes, silly name, should rename) indicates whether we dnl want there to be *run-time* (and build-time) support for Java extensions in the dnl built LibreOffice. -dnl SOLAR_JAVA="BUILD" indicate build-time only support (no runtime support) + +dnl SOLAR_JAVA="BUILD" is claimed to indicate build-time only support +dnl (no runtime support). It doesn't seem to ever be set to this +dnl value, though, and everywhere SOLAR_JAVA is only checked for being +dnl empty or non-empty. + dnl SOLAR_JAVA="" indicate no java support at all if test "$_os" = "Linux" && test "$host_cpu" = "powerpc"; then -- cgit