From 33cf2b6613da36863f6f64a7ac1e413ac1e641ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 18:33:31 +0200
Subject: Let jfw_isVMRunning return the result; there are no error conditions

Change-Id: I004b3d6f6b7b32d1bb41072d7fdd4a66f944d992
---
 include/jvmfwk/framework.hxx | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

(limited to 'include/jvmfwk/framework.hxx')

diff --git a/include/jvmfwk/framework.hxx b/include/jvmfwk/framework.hxx
index e941b9a9f2fc..d212ed224455 100644
--- a/include/jvmfwk/framework.hxx
+++ b/include/jvmfwk/framework.hxx
@@ -295,15 +295,10 @@ JVMFWK_DLLPUBLIC bool jfw_areEqualJavaInfo(
     By determining if a VM is running, the user can be presented a message,
     that the changed setting may not be effective immediately.</p>
 
-    @param bRunning
-    [out] true - a VM is running. <br/>
-    false - no VM is running.
-
     @return
-    JFW_E_NONE function ran successfully.<br/>
-    JFW_E_INVALID_ARG the parameter <code>bRunning</code> was NULL.
+    true iff a VM is running.
 */
-JVMFWK_DLLPUBLIC javaFrameworkError jfw_isVMRunning(bool *bRunning);
+JVMFWK_DLLPUBLIC bool jfw_isVMRunning();
 
 /** detects a suitable JRE and configures the framework to use it.
 
-- 
cgit