From 3b176d77e7021d1ce3e82c28b921bbd4f7523a7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tor Lillqvist Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:03:02 +0200 Subject: Use SAL_INFO() instead of printf() printf() and SAL_INFO() / SAL_DEBUG() output apparently don't end up in correct order in a cppunit log file which can be extremely confusing. So let's use SAL_INFO() (with the tag sc.qa) for the qahelper debug output. Change-Id: I529482c07651f84688ec5751d2b3dfc7d89cb4ca --- include/sal/log-areas.dox | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'include') diff --git a/include/sal/log-areas.dox b/include/sal/log-areas.dox index eb22ea098275..7d8d70f6f0c2 100644 --- a/include/sal/log-areas.dox +++ b/include/sal/log-areas.dox @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ certain functionality. @li @c sc @li @c sc.opencl @li @c sc.opencl.thread +@li @c sc.qa @li @c sc.core @li @c sc.filter - Calc filter @li @c sc.ui - Calc UI -- cgit