From 362d4f0cd4e50111edfae9d30c90602c37ed65a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:18:35 +0200
Subject: Explicitly mark overriding destructors as "virtual"

It appears that the C++ standard allows overriding destructors to be marked
"override," but at least some MSVC versions complain about it, so at least make
sure such destructors are explicitly marked "virtual."

Change-Id: I0e1cafa7584fd16ebdce61f569eae2373a71b0a1
---
 lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfconfigmanager.hxx | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfconfigmanager.hxx')

diff --git a/lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfconfigmanager.hxx b/lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfconfigmanager.hxx
index 95e29f114d38..c467d18ddfd9 100644
--- a/lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfconfigmanager.hxx
+++ b/lotuswordpro/source/filter/xfilter/xfconfigmanager.hxx
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ class XFConfigManager : public XFStyleContainer
 {
 public:
     XFConfigManager();
-    ~XFConfigManager();
+    virtual ~XFConfigManager();
 
 public:
     /**
-- 
cgit