From 616c6924f18911fce110918edf05ed2f4e52dba9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tor Lillqvist Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:48:17 +0200 Subject: s/the the/the/ Change-Id: Iadacffaad832c6ff06757e8567e24f929f24a4c3 --- sal/osl/w32/interlck.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'sal/osl') diff --git a/sal/osl/w32/interlck.c b/sal/osl/w32/interlck.c index 70933e68fa24..13392c89ee05 100644 --- a/sal/osl/w32/interlck.c +++ b/sal/osl/w32/interlck.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ extern int osl_isSingleCPU; /* For all Intel x86 above x486 we use a spezial inline assembler implementation. The main reason is that WIN9? does not return the result of the operation. Instead there is only returned a value greater than zero is the increment - result is greater than zero, but not the the result of the addition. + result is greater than zero, but not the result of the addition. For Windows NT the native function could be used, because the correct result is returned. Beacuse of simpler code maintance and performace reasons we use on every x86-Windows-Platform the inline assembler implementation. -- cgit