From 362d4f0cd4e50111edfae9d30c90602c37ed65a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:18:35 +0200
Subject: Explicitly mark overriding destructors as "virtual"

It appears that the C++ standard allows overriding destructors to be marked
"override," but at least some MSVC versions complain about it, so at least make
sure such destructors are explicitly marked "virtual."

Change-Id: I0e1cafa7584fd16ebdce61f569eae2373a71b0a1
---
 sal/qa/rtl/doublelock/rtl_doublelocking.cxx | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'sal/qa/rtl')

diff --git a/sal/qa/rtl/doublelock/rtl_doublelocking.cxx b/sal/qa/rtl/doublelock/rtl_doublelocking.cxx
index 84685b8880a7..1a8912bbcd91 100644
--- a/sal/qa/rtl/doublelock/rtl_doublelocking.cxx
+++ b/sal/qa/rtl/doublelock/rtl_doublelocking.cxx
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ public:
             ::osl::Thread::suspend();
         }
 
-    ~OGetThread()
+    virtual ~OGetThread()
         {
             if (isRunning())
             {
-- 
cgit