From c95e3fb64695cedfa40bfe5472879ee8a692d73f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:52:16 +0000
Subject: disable Ranges-2.xls vba test file

there seems to be some problem ( regression from 3.6 ? ) with dealing with
addresses returned from named ranges where the addressing mode of the named
range is different from the addressing mode of the document itself

Change-Id: Icfcd047819a4d1c89ae9509ea1a2e1b2d5386101
---
 sc/Module_sc.mk | 17 -----------------
 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

(limited to 'sc/Module_sc.mk')

diff --git a/sc/Module_sc.mk b/sc/Module_sc.mk
index 4a4fc4192b85..b4cfcb520553 100644
--- a/sc/Module_sc.mk
+++ b/sc/Module_sc.mk
@@ -59,24 +59,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Module_add_slowcheck_targets,sc, \
 # CppunitTest_sc_annotationshapeobj \
 
 $(eval $(call gb_Module_add_subsequentcheck_targets,sc,\
-    JunitTest_sc_complex \
-    JunitTest_sc_unoapi \
-    CppunitTest_sc_outlineobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_annotationobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_annotationsobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_cellrangeobj \
-    $(if $(filter-out $(OS),IOS), \
-	    CppunitTest_sc_databaserangeobj) \
-    CppunitTest_sc_datapilottableobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_datapilotfieldobj \
     CppunitTest_sc_macros_test \
-    CppunitTest_sc_namedrangeobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_namedrangesobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_tablesheetobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_tablesheetsobj \
-    CppunitTest_sc_editfieldobj_cell \
-    CppunitTest_sc_editfieldobj_header \
-    CppunitTest_sc_modelobj \
 ))
 
 # vim: set noet sw=4 ts=4:
-- 
cgit