From 21a9bc8716a88fa2472c525b2e6f84fe1213a8f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Noel Grandin <noel@peralex.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:40:28 +0200
Subject: no need to take a mutex when only dealing with stack-local data

Change-Id: Ie45e626aad55a8174a53b769a98601bf54dedf65
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/19979
Tested-by: Jenkins <ci@libreoffice.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noelgrandin@gmail.com>
---
 scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'scripting')

diff --git a/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx b/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx
index e1a1e6162b9d..1c5d8558d485 100644
--- a/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx
+++ b/scripting/source/protocolhandler/scripthandler.cxx
@@ -468,9 +468,8 @@ throw( RuntimeException, std::exception )
 /* Helper for XServiceInfo */
 Sequence< OUString > ScriptProtocolHandler::impl_getStaticSupportedServiceNames()
 {
-    ::osl::MutexGuard aGuard( ::osl::Mutex::getGlobalMutex() );
     Sequence< OUString > seqServiceNames { OUString::createFromAscii(::scripting_protocolhandler::MYSERVICENAME) };
-    return seqServiceNames ;
+    return seqServiceNames;
 }
 
 /* Helper for XServiceInfo */
-- 
cgit