From 362d4f0cd4e50111edfae9d30c90602c37ed65a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:18:35 +0200
Subject: Explicitly mark overriding destructors as "virtual"

It appears that the C++ standard allows overriding destructors to be marked
"override," but at least some MSVC versions complain about it, so at least make
sure such destructors are explicitly marked "virtual."

Change-Id: I0e1cafa7584fd16ebdce61f569eae2373a71b0a1
---
 sw/inc/doc.hxx | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'sw/inc/doc.hxx')

diff --git a/sw/inc/doc.hxx b/sw/inc/doc.hxx
index 35e4208982ba..aff1ba0a5abe 100644
--- a/sw/inc/doc.hxx
+++ b/sw/inc/doc.hxx
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ public:
 
     // Life cycle
     SwDoc();
-    ~SwDoc();
+    virtual ~SwDoc();
 
     bool IsInDtor() const { return mbDtor; }
 
-- 
cgit