| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Replace them with default initialization or calloc
Change-Id: I747f53c2ced2d0473fd5a5ede4f8520a0633dcc1
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/80805
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|
|
Plus a quick recheck for files in vcl/source/[a-g]*/
Found with bin/find-unneeded-includes
Only removal proposals are dealt with here.
Change-Id: Ia1ae951047be2e034da5f3b0422613ddb0a091ad
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/78065
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com>
|
|
which seem to have snuck back in since the great rounds of removals.
Change-Id: I85f7f5f4801c0b48dae8b50f51f83595b286d6a1
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/62229
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
Change-Id: Ia0a19736dfd4500bb17b04c072710f8ee8744031
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/60526
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin <noel.grandin@collabora.co.uk>
|
|
...warning about (for now only) functions and variables with external linkage
that likely don't need it.
The problems with moving entities into unnamed namespacs and breaking ADL
(as alluded to in comments in compilerplugins/clang/external.cxx) are
illustrated by the fact that while
struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
namespace N {
struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } };
int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); }
}
int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
returns 1, both moving just the struct S2 into an nunnamed namespace,
struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
namespace N {
namespace { struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } }; }
int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); }
}
int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
as well as moving just the function f overload into an unnamed namespace,
struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } };
int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); }
namespace N {
struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } };
namespace { int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); } }
}
int main() { return f(N::S2()); }
would each change the program to return 0 instead.
Change-Id: I4d09f7ac5e8f9bcd6e6bde4712608444b642265c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/60539
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
|