Sometimes, developers mention other bugs in the body as related issues. This might create mislead information in the release notes E.g: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/6.1.1/RC1 * Caolán is mentioned as fixer of i#66963 because the id is in the body of 9c3d8b1c64c2ce5a2fd39aa785df45f6b1d6628b which fixes tdf#98558 * M. Stahl is mentioned as fixer of tdf#112447 because the id is in the body of 31e66bd07c1082bb375be8aaf7835f019351d9bb This bug was fixed by Bjoern Michaelsen in ce2fce9a41729774689080c8b5552b60c2e6ee2d Change-Id: I8d0ee038741dbb27364a56a7fa9285f32839c37b Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/69750 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Andras Timar <andras.timar@collabora.com>
Change-Id: I01f5a09e65091f460c28f6c18d683f5a3135762e Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/67100 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Julien Nabet <serval2412@yahoo.fr>
Change-Id: Iaa9c0aea3ea1a239e378bd714ba335f91bb1faf3 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/41194 Reviewed-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> Tested-by: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com>
it also doesn't make sense to numerically compare a %hash enable warnings in the script and remove a duplicated variable (and some unnecessary hash-declarations) Change-Id: I0a84dc28f369931ee31a1cf12849fde2b63f1ca2
Change-Id: I8eb5a3d3141fcc76bf5caffe0a7b30d5ec2b0c8c
Change-Id: I61960512e297417eb096b3bc921974aa43f74ccc
besides using deprecated syntax – "if (defined %hash)" (or "if (defined @array)" for that matter) – just using "if (%hash)" (or "if (@array)") would do, it is also unnecessary to create the hash if it doesn't exist (autovivification will take care of that) Change-Id: Ib5704b2d609ae3658f3c166f9e26a051957149f8