1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
/*************************************************************************
*
* OpenOffice.org - a multi-platform office productivity suite
*
* $RCSfile: interlck.c,v $
*
* $Revision: 1.3 $
*
* last change: $Author: rt $ $Date: 2005-09-08 15:06:36 $
*
* The Contents of this file are made available subject to
* the terms of GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1.
*
*
* GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1
* =============================================
* Copyright 2005 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.
* 901 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License version 2.1, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston,
* MA 02111-1307 USA
*
************************************************************************/
#include "system.h"
#include <osl/interlck.h>
#include <osl/diagnose.h>
/* For all Intel x86 above x486 we use a spezial inline assembler implementation.
The main reason is that WIN9? does not return the result of the operation.
Instead there is only returned a value greater than zero is the increment
result is greater than zero, but not the the result of the addition.
For Windows NT the native function could be used, because the correct result
is returned. Beacuse of simpler code maintance and performace reasons we use
on every x86-Windows-Platform the inline assembler implementation.
*/
/*****************************************************************************/
/* osl_incrementInterlockedCount */
/*****************************************************************************/
oslInterlockedCount SAL_CALL osl_incrementInterlockedCount(oslInterlockedCount* pCount)
#ifdef _M_IX86
#pragma warning(disable: 4035)
{
__asm
{
mov ecx, pCount
mov eax, 1
lock xadd dword ptr [ecx],eax
inc eax
}
}
#pragma warning(default: 4035)
#else
#pragma message("WARNING: Using system InterlockedIncrement")
{
return (InterlockedIncrement(pCount));
}
#endif
/*****************************************************************************/
/* osl_decrementInterlockedCount */
/*****************************************************************************/
oslInterlockedCount SAL_CALL osl_decrementInterlockedCount(oslInterlockedCount* pCount)
#ifdef _M_IX86
#pragma warning(disable: 4035)
{
__asm
{
mov ecx, pCount
mov eax, -1
lock xadd dword ptr [ecx],eax
dec eax
}
}
#pragma warning(default: 4035)
#else
#pragma message("WARNING: Using system InterlockedDecrement")
{
return (InterlockedDecrement(pCount));
}
#endif
|
