cui « rw « source - lo/translations - LibreOffice 界面翻译代码仓库

Mode	Name	Size
d---------	source	155	log plain
d---------	uiconfig	33	log plain

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2023-01-27	Remove support for AIX	Stephan Bergmann
	As discussed in the mailing list thread starting at <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-January/089808.html> "Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)", the bridge implementation at bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_aix_powerpc is apparently dead and should thus be removed. However, that was the only bridge implementation for AIX, which implies that support for the AIX platform as a whole is dead and should thus be removed. Change-Id: I96de3f7f97d4fd770ff78256f0ea435383688be9 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/146057 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
2019-11-17	cid#706181 Use of untrusted string value	Caolán McNamara
	use an annotation here and add one to the windows equivalent Change-Id: Ife54949c2e89ae606d7931be82807db4bbb132dc Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/83024 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>
2018-09-17	New loplugin:external	Stephan Bergmann
	...warning about (for now only) functions and variables with external linkage that likely don't need it. The problems with moving entities into unnamed namespacs and breaking ADL (as alluded to in comments in compilerplugins/clang/external.cxx) are illustrated by the fact that while struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } }; int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); } namespace N { struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } }; int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); } } int main() { return f(N::S2()); } returns 1, both moving just the struct S2 into an nunnamed namespace, struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } }; int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); } namespace N { namespace { struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } }; } int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); } } int main() { return f(N::S2()); } as well as moving just the function f overload into an unnamed namespace, struct S1 { int f() { return 0; } }; int f(S1 s) { return s.f(); } namespace N { struct S2: S1 { int f() { return 1; } }; namespace { int f(S2 s) { return s.f(); } } } int main() { return f(N::S2()); } would each change the program to return 0 instead. Change-Id: I4d09f7ac5e8f9bcd6e6bde4712608444b642265c Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/60539 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>